Fix: mikrotik_routeros_ip_address_print (#1918)

Author: kwood92

ntc_templates/templates/mikrotik_routeros_ip_address_print.textfsm

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Value NETWORK (\S+)
 Value INTERFACE (.*?)
 
 Start
-  ^\s*Flags:\s*(?:X\s*-\s*disabled,)?\s*(?:I\s*-\s*invalid,)?\s*(?:D\s*-\s*(?:DYNAMIC|dynamic))?\s*$$
+  ^\s*Flags:
   ^\s*Columns:\s*ADDRESS,\s*NETWORK,\s*INTERFACE\s*$$
   ^\s*#\s+ADDRESS\s+NETWORK\s+INTERFACE\s*$$ -> IPsTable
   ^\s*$$

tests/mikrotik_routeros/ip_address_print/mikrotik_routeros_ip_address_print_5.raw

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+Flags: X - DISABLED, I - INVALID, D - DYNAMIC
+Columns: ADDRESS, NETWORK, INTERFACE
+ #   ADDRESS            NETWORK         INTERFACE
+;;; Tech Access
+ 0   192.168.10.1/24    192.168.10.0    sfp-sfpplus10
+;;; BACKHAUL DISABLED
+ 2 X 1.1.1.1/29   1.1.1.0   vlan4009@bond1
+;;; FIBRE BACKHAUL
+ 3 X 1.1.1.1/30  1.1.1.0  sfp-sfpplus2
+;;; BACKHAUL DISABLED
+ 4 I 1.1.1.1/29   1.1.1.0   vlan4011@bond1
+ 5 D 1.1.1.1/32   1.1.1.1    pppoe-out1

tests/mikrotik_routeros/ip_address_print/mikrotik_routeros_ip_address_print_5.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+---
+parsed_sample:
+  - comment: "Tech Access"
+    flags: ""
+    interface: "sfp-sfpplus10"
+    ip: "192.168.10.1"
+    network: "192.168.10.0"
+    num: "0"
+    subnet: "24"
+  - comment: "BACKHAUL DISABLED"
+    flags: "X"
+    interface: "vlan4009@bond1"
+    ip: "1.1.1.1"
+    network: "1.1.1.0"
+    num: "2"
+    subnet: "29"
+  - comment: "FIBRE BACKHAUL"
+    flags: "X"
+    interface: "sfp-sfpplus2"
+    ip: "1.1.1.1"
+    network: "1.1.1.0"
+    num: "3"
+    subnet: "30"
+  - comment: "BACKHAUL DISABLED"
+    flags: "I"
+    interface: "vlan4011@bond1"
+    ip: "1.1.1.1"
+    network: "1.1.1.0"
+    num: "4"
+    subnet: "29"
+  - comment: ""
+    flags: "D"
+    interface: "pppoe-out1"
+    ip: "1.1.1.1"
+    network: "1.1.1.1"
+    num: "5"
+    subnet: "32"