s01 → ... → s10 → s11 → s12 → s13 → s14 → ... → s20
"Break big goals into small tasks, order them, persist" — File-persisted task graph, the foundation for multi-agent collaboration.
Harness Layer: Tasks — Persisted goals, recoverable progress.
The agent receives a project: set up a database, write APIs, add tests. It uses s05's TodoWrite to create a checklist, then starts writing the API first, gets halfway through and realizes there are no database tables, goes back to fix them; when adding tests, discovers the API interface signatures have changed again...
You can't build the roof before laying the foundation. Tasks have ordering. Task dependencies should form a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG); the teaching version only demonstrates blockedBy checking, without cycle detection.
s05's TodoWrite is a list. No dependencies, no persistence — when the conversation ends, the list is gone. What you need is a task system: each task is a JSON file, tasks have blockedBy dependencies, and they persist across sessions on disk.
Teaching code keeps a basic agent loop, omitting S11's full error recovery (RecoveryState, backoff, escalation, reactive compact, fallback model) to stay focused on the task system. Added: 5 new task tools + .tasks/ directory for persistence + blockedBy dependency checking. The task system and error recovery are independent layers: in CC source, utils/tasks.ts only handles CRUD, while query.ts's with_retry/RecoveryState handles error recovery, with no coupling between them.
TodoWrite vs Task System:
| TodoWrite (s05) | Task System (s12) | |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | In-memory list | .tasks/ JSON files |
| Dependencies | None | blockedBy dependency graph |
| Persistence | Lost when conversation ends | Cross-session |
| Multi-agent | None | owner field |
| Status | checked / unchecked | pending → in_progress → completed |
Each task is a JSON file, stored in the .tasks/ directory:
@dataclass
class Task:
id: str
subject: str
description: str
status: str # pending | in_progress | completed
owner: str | None # Agent name (multi-agent scenarios)
blockedBy: list[str] # List of dependency task IDsIDs are generated with timestamp + random hex, simple but sufficient. CC uses sequential IDs + a highwatermark file to prevent ID reuse, which is a more rigorous design.
def create_task(subject: str, description: str = "",
blockedBy: list[str] | None = None) -> Task:
task = Task(
id=f"task_{int(time.time())}_{random_hex(4)}",
subject=subject, description=description,
status="pending", owner=None,
blockedBy=blockedBy or [],
)
save_task(task)
return taskAutomatically calls save_task on creation to write .tasks/{id}.json. blockedBy declares dependencies, for example "write API" has blockedBy: ["task_schema"].
A task can only start after all its blockedBy dependencies are completed:
def can_start(task_id: str) -> bool:
task = load_task(task_id)
for dep_id in task.blockedBy:
if not _task_path(dep_id).exists():
return False # missing dependency = blocked
dep = load_task(dep_id)
if dep.status != "completed":
return False
return Truecan_start is a prerequisite check for claim_task: if any blockedBy dependency is not completed, the task cannot be claimed. Missing dependencies are treated as blocked, avoiding crashes from referencing wrong IDs.
When the agent starts working on a task, it calls claim_task: sets owner, changes status from pending → in_progress. The owner field records who is working on the task, preventing duplicate claims in multi-agent scenarios:
def claim_task(task_id: str, owner: str = "agent") -> str:
task = load_task(task_id)
if task.status != "pending":
return f"Task {task_id} is {task.status}, cannot claim"
if not can_start(task_id):
deps = [d for d in task.blockedBy
if load_task(d).status != "completed"]
return f"Blocked by: {deps}"
task.owner = owner
task.status = "in_progress"
save_task(task)
return f"Claimed {task_id} ({task.subject})"If the task is already claimed by someone else (status != "pending"), or dependencies aren't met (can_start returns False), the claim is rejected.
When a task is done, set it to completed. Simultaneously scan all other tasks to find downstream tasks that were just unblocked:
def complete_task(task_id: str) -> str:
task = load_task(task_id)
task.status = "completed"
save_task(task)
# Find newly unblocked downstream tasks
unblocked = [t.subject for t in list_tasks()
if t.status == "pending" and t.blockedBy
and can_start(t.id)]
msg = f"Completed {task_id} ({task.subject})"
if unblocked:
msg += f"\nUnblocked: {', '.join(unblocked)}"
return msgAfter completing "schema", can_start returns True for "endpoints" and "docs"; they can begin.
list_tasks only shows a one-line summary. get_task returns the full task JSON, including description and dependency details. When recovering across sessions, the agent needs to read the full description to continue work:
def get_task(task_id: str) -> str:
task = load_task(task_id)
return json.dumps(asdict(task), indent=2)pending ──claim──→ in_progress ──complete──→ completed
Here claim / complete are actions, while pending / in_progress / completed are states:
- claim_task:
pending→in_progress. Sets owner, begins work. - complete_task:
in_progress→completed. Marks the task done and unblocks downstream.
CC has no in_progress → pending release path. If a teammate terminates or shuts down, CC unassigns its unfinished tasks (clears owner) and resets status to pending, allowing other agents to reclaim them. The teaching version omits this recovery path.
# Create tasks with dependencies
schema = create_task("setup database schema")
endpoints = create_task("create API endpoints", blockedBy=[schema.id])
tests = create_task("write tests", blockedBy=[endpoints.id])
docs = create_task("write docs", blockedBy=[schema.id])
# Agent claims the first available task
claim_task(schema.id) # ✓ Claimed (no dependencies)
complete_task(schema.id) # ✓ Completed → unblocks endpoints, docs
claim_task(endpoints.id) # ✓ Claimed (schema completed)
complete_task(endpoints.id) # ✓ Completed → unblocks tests
claim_task(docs.id) # ✓ Claimed (schema completed)
complete_task(docs.id) # ✓ Completed
claim_task(tests.id) # ✓ Claimed (endpoints completed)
complete_task(tests.id) # ✓ CompletedEach create_task writes a JSON file, each claim_task / complete_task updates the file. Across sessions, the .tasks/ directory persists — the agent reads the files to recover progress.
| Component | Before (s11) | After (s12) |
|---|---|---|
| Task management | None | Task dataclass + 5 tools |
| New types | — | Task (id, subject, description, status, owner, blockedBy) |
| Storage | No persistence | .tasks/{id}.json cross-session |
| Dependencies | None | blockedBy graph + can_start check |
| Tools | bash, read_file, write_file (3) | + create_task, list_tasks, get_task, claim_task, complete_task (8) |
| Lifecycle | — | pending → in_progress → completed (no release rollback) |
cd learn-claude-code
python s12_task_system/code.pyTry these prompts:
Create tasks: setup database schema, create API endpoints (depends on schema), write tests (depends on endpoints), write docs (depends on schema)List all tasks and their statusesClaim the first unblocked task and complete itList tasks again — which ones are now unblocked?
What to observe: Are JSON files generated in the .tasks/ directory? After completing a task, are the blocked tasks unblocked?
The task graph is in place. But some tasks take a long time — like running full test suites or deploying to a server. The agent calls the LLM billed by token, it can't afford to wait on a slow operation.
s13 Background Tasks → Slow operations go to the background. The agent continues processing other tasks, and gets notified when the background work is done.
Deep Dive into CC Source
The following is a complete analysis based on CC source code
utils/tasks.ts(862 lines),tools/TaskCreateTool/TaskCreateTool.ts(138 lines),tools/TaskUpdateTool/TaskUpdateTool.ts(406 lines),tools/TaskGetTool/TaskGetTool.ts(128 lines),tools/TaskListTool/TaskListTool.ts(116 lines),hooks/useTaskListWatcher.ts(221 lines).
The tutorial only covers id, subject, status, owner, blockedBy. CC actually has 9 fields (utils/tasks.ts:76-89):
| Field | Type | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
id |
string | Incrementing integer ID |
subject |
string | Short title |
description |
string | Free-form description |
activeForm |
string? | Present tense form, shown in spinner when in_progress |
owner |
string? | Assigned agent ID |
status |
pending/in_progress/completed | Lifecycle |
blocks |
string[] | Task IDs blocked by this task (downstream) |
blockedBy |
string[] | Task IDs blocking this task (upstream) |
metadata |
Record? | Arbitrary extension key-value pairs |
Storage location: ~/.claude/tasks/{taskListId}/{id}.json. One file per task.
In CC, Task System and TodoWrite coexist, toggled by isTodoV2Enabled() (utils/tasks.ts:133) — interactive sessions default to Task (V2), non-interactive/SDK sessions default to TodoWrite. The CLAUDE_CODE_ENABLE_TASKS env var can force-enable Task. Task has what TodoWrite lacks: file-lock concurrency protection, dependency enforcement, ownership, fs.watch reactive monitoring, lifecycle hooks.
claimTask() (utils/tasks.ts:541-612) uses dual locking to prevent races:
Task file lock: proper-lockfile locks {taskId}.json (up to 30 retries, exponential backoff 5-100ms). Inside the lock:
- Re-read task (prevent TOCTOU)
- Check already claimed by another →
already_claimed - Check already completed →
already_resolved - Check upstream not completed →
blocked - Set owner
List-level lock (agent busy check): .lock file, atomic scan of all tasks to check if the agent already has other open tasks.
Note: The teaching version combines claiming and starting work into one step (claim = set owner + in_progress); real CC's claimTask primarily resolves owner competition — it only sets owner without changing status. Status updates are handled by TaskUpdate.
The .highwatermark file records the highest task ID ever assigned. Even if a task is deleted, its ID won't be reused.
CC's task system has four tools (not the tutorial's single generic Task tool): TaskCreate, TaskGet, TaskUpdate, TaskList. All set isConcurrencySafe: true and shouldDefer: true (tool schemas aren't in the initial prompt; only visible after ToolSearch).
The teaching version's create_task(blockedBy=...) declares dependencies at creation time, which is a reasonable simplification. Real CC's TaskCreate only accepts subject/description/activeForm/metadata — dependencies are maintained via TaskUpdate's addBlocks/addBlockedBy.