chore(minutes): add 12 Jan 2026 (#3)

Author: JakobJingleheimer

minutes/2026-01-12 test-runner meeting minutes.md

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+# 12 January 2026
+
+## Attendees
+
+* Alex Vespa [@vespa7](https://github.com/vespa7)
+* Jacob Smith [@JakobJingleheimer](https://github.com/JakobJingleheimer) (chair)
+* Jordan Harband [@ljharb](https://github.com/ljharb)
+* Moshe Atlow [@MoLow](https://github.com/MoLow)
+* Pietro Marchini [@pmarchini](https://github.com/pmarchini)
+* Vas Sudanagunta [@vassudanagunta](https://github.com/vassudanagunta)
+
+## Topics
+
+* New team repo https://github.com/nodejs/test-runner
+* Team Kanban: https://github.com/orgs/nodejs/projects/14
+* Name for "expect failure": https://github.com/nodejs/test-runner/discussions/1
+* Jacob proposed `flaky`, per https://github.com/nodejs/test-runner/discussions/1#discussioncomment-15468740
+
+## Outcomes
+
+* "Expect failure" feature:
+  * Consensus reached for name: `expectFailure".
+  * Widespread agreement on feature behaviour and use-cases.
+    * Assertion inversion is perhaps not the targeted audience, but there no reason to get in its way. Documentation (likely a Learn article) may call out that use-case, but it's generally accepted to be not the focus.
+* Consensus that `flaky` is a desired feature and general agreement on its behaviour/scope.
+
+## Todos
+
+* Need review (@nodejs/test-runner):
+  * https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/56490
+  * https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/59732
+  * https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/59700
+* Write feature proposal (@JakobJingleheimer) for `flaky`
+  * @JakobJingleheimer to support @vespa7 on implementation