-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 496
fix: improve compare quadrant chart labels #2416
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 2 commits
1dafd2a
2a48d81
5e1ffb8
ef000e0
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -1237,27 +1237,27 @@ | |
| "add_hint": "Add at least 2 packages to compare." | ||
| }, | ||
| "quadrant_chart": { | ||
| "label_x_axis": "Adoption", | ||
| "label_y_axis": "Efficiency", | ||
| "label_top_right": "high impact", | ||
| "label_bottom_right": "popular but heavy", | ||
| "label_bottom_left": "low impact", | ||
| "label_top_left": "promising", | ||
| "title": "Adoption vs Package efficiency", | ||
| "filename": "package-adoption-vs-efficiency-matrix", | ||
| "label_x_axis": "Traction", | ||
| "label_y_axis": "Ergonomics", | ||
| "label_top_right": "Solid picks", | ||
| "label_bottom_right": "popular with tradeoffs", | ||
| "label_bottom_left": "avoid", | ||
| "label_top_left": "hidden gems", | ||
| "title": "Package traction vs ergonomics", | ||
| "filename": "package-traction-vs-ergonomics-quadrant", | ||
| "label_freshness_score": "Freshness score", | ||
| "copy_alt": { | ||
| "description": "Quadrant chart mapping adoption versus efficiency for the {packages} packages. {analysis}. {watermark}.", | ||
| "side_analysis_top_right": "The following packages are positioned on the top-right quadrant (high-impact): {packages}", | ||
| "side_analysis_top_left": "The following packages are positioned on the top-left quadrant (promising): {packages}", | ||
| "side_analysis_bottom_right": "The following packages are positioned on the bottom-right quadrant (popular but heavy): {packages}", | ||
| "side_analysis_bottom_left": "The following packages are positioned on the bottom-left quadrant (low-impact): {packages}" | ||
| "description": "Quadrant chart mapping traction versus efficiency for the {packages} packages. {analysis}. {watermark}.", | ||
| "side_analysis_top_right": "The following packages are positioned on the top-right quadrant (solid picks): {packages}", | ||
| "side_analysis_top_left": "The following packages are positioned on the top-left quadrant (hidden gems): {packages}", | ||
| "side_analysis_bottom_right": "The following packages are positioned on the bottom-right quadrant (popular with tradeoffs): {packages}", | ||
| "side_analysis_bottom_left": "The following packages are positioned on the bottom-left quadrant (avoid): {packages}" | ||
| }, | ||
| "explanation": { | ||
| "tooltip_help": "Show scoring explanation", | ||
| "introduction": "The score is calculated by combining multiple signals into two axes:", | ||
| "adoption": "Adoption: reflects usage and activity (downloads, freshness, likes)", | ||
| "efficiency": "Package efficiency: reflects footprint and quality (install size, dependencies, vulnerabilities, type support)", | ||
| "adoption": "Traction: reflects usage and activity (downloads, freshness, likes)", | ||
| "efficiency": "Ergonomics: reflects footprint and quality (install size, dependencies, vulnerabilities, type support)", | ||
|
Comment on lines
+1259
to
+1260
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 💭 Would it be hard to show these as tooltips on the two axis labels themselves as well? As a user I think that would be the first thing I would try to find out what the axes mean.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Very good idea 💡 Probably requires to inject foreignObjects in the #svg slot, and use our tooltip thing inside, and hoping it works on Safari (and behaves correctly in print). Will try to make it work. |
||
| "impact_details": "Each metric contributes with a different weight. Strong signals like downloads and install size have the largest impact, while others refine the result. Some signals (such as vulnerabilities or deprecation) apply penalties." | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.