docs(releases): keep the v17 strictness note inside the ADR-0090 vocabulary ratchet

check-role-word flagged the new RLS alias example — spell it as "the
pre-ADR-0090 D3 vocabulary -> positions" instead of naming the retired word.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0147tNF4Snk7Ry1KGt4a5PY4

Author: claude

content/docs/releases/v17.mdx

@@ -329,9 +329,9 @@ schema to the two highest-risk authorable surfaces, per the triage in
   layer (see the alias table above).
 - **RLS policies** — `RowLevelSecurityPolicySchema`. A silently dropped key
   here meant a row-level restriction the author wrote was never compiled into
-  the filter (`roles` → `positions`, `withCheck` → `check`,
-  `condition`/`filter`/`where` → `using`). The runtime evaluation shapes stay
-  tolerant.
+  the filter (the pre-ADR-0090 D3 vocabulary → `positions`,
+  `withCheck` → `check`, `condition`/`filter`/`where` → `using`). The runtime
+  evaluation shapes stay tolerant.
 - **Sharing rules** — the rule, its criteria extension, and the `sharedWith`
   recipient (`criteria` → `condition`, `access` → `accessLevel`,
   `recipient` → `sharedWith`; `ownedBy` carries the removed owner-type-rule