test(platform-objects): regression guard for the ADR-0057 BU rename (i18n)#2130
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…abels) Asserts sys_business_unit / sys_business_unit_member object + field labels across all locales no longer retain the old 'department' term (the regression that the prior PR fixed). Labels only — field descriptions, the `kind` enum value 'department', and the multi-concept node descriptions are intentionally in scope-out. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
github-actions
Bot
added
documentation
Contributor
📓 Docs Drift CheckThis PR changes 1 package(s): 3 hand-written doc(s) reference the affected code and may need an implementation-accuracy re-verification:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to #2129. The BU rename once half-landed (object label "业务单元" but field labels still "上级部门"). This adds a vitest that asserts the
sys_business_unit/sys_business_unit_memberobject + field labels across en/zh/ja/es carry no stale "department" term — so the next rename can't silently leave field labels behind.Scope is labels only (intentionally not field descriptions/help, the
kindenum valuedepartment, or the multi-concept node descriptions — those keep the word legitimately). Test-only; empty changeset.🤖 Generated with Claude Code