It seems to me that there are some problems with data for patient 01-013 (Prime_FULL), as images for W8 and W12 are exactly the same e.g.
diff -s ./01-013/W8/OS/28.tif ./01-013/W12/OS/28.tif
gives
Files ./01-013/W8/OS/28.tif and ./01-013/W12/OS/28.tif are identical
This can be observed for all images in that weeks for patient 01-013.
For the TREX DME I also could find exactly the same files and it looks that there might be an issue (data from different visits looks the same) e.g.
diff -s './TREX DME/GILA/0236GOS/V7/OD/TREXN_000021.tif' './TREX DME/TREX/0231TOD/V10/OD/TREXN_000021.tif'
gives
Files ./TREX DME/GILA/0236GOS/V7/OD/TREXN_000022.tif and ./TREX DME/TREX/0231TOD/V10/OD/TREXN_000022.tif are identical
All pairs of identical files were found using
find . -type f -name "*.tif" -exec md5sum {} + | sort | uniq -D -w32
It seems to me that there are some problems with data for patient
01-013(Prime_FULL), as images forW8andW12are exactly the same e.g.gives
This can be observed for all images in that weeks for patient
01-013.For the
TREX DMEI also could find exactly the same files and it looks that there might be an issue (data from different visits looks the same) e.g.gives
All pairs of identical files were found using