Skip to content

interfaces as algebraic data types where applicable #411

Description

@ransomw1c

with the last iteration of this comment (on getArchivePathComponents) being elided from the source and yet another instance of "let's use interfaces to represent sum/union types!" enthusiasm appearing in my commentary elsewhere, i'd like to have the vestiges of this link trail (into github comments, into git history) referenced from the issue tracker.

so i am doing just that! creating a spin-off issue here and resolving this comment immediately.

Originally posted by @ransomw1c in #402

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions