fix(deps): update dependency requests to v2.33.0 [security]#1756
Merged
Conversation
oep-renovate
Bot
requested review from
a team,
jcchr,
leoll2,
mgumowsk and
piotrgrubicki
as code owners
oep-renovate
Bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/pypi-requests-vulnerability
branch
2 times, most recently
from
35cee3b to
1255a65
Compare
oep-renovate
Bot
changed the title
oep-renovate
Bot
changed the title
oep-renovate
Bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/pypi-requests-vulnerability
branch
3 times, most recently
from
bcb60fe to
e5d78c9
Compare
oep-renovate
Bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/pypi-requests-vulnerability
branch
from
e5d78c9 to
99eba5e
Compare
Signed-off-by: oep-renovate[bot] <212772560+oep-renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
oep-renovate
Bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/pypi-requests-vulnerability
branch
from
99eba5e to
d06afef
Compare
jcchr
approved these changes
May 7, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains the following updates:
==2.32.4→==2.33.02.32.4→2.33.0~=2.32.4→~=2.33.0Requests vulnerable to .netrc credentials leak via malicious URLs
CVE-2024-47081 / GHSA-9hjg-9r4m-mvj7
More information
Details
Impact
Due to a URL parsing issue, Requests releases prior to 2.32.4 may leak .netrc credentials to third parties for specific maliciously-crafted URLs.
Workarounds
For older versions of Requests, use of the .netrc file can be disabled with
trust_env=Falseon your Requests Session (docs).References
https://github.com/psf/requests/pull/6965
https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2025/Jun/2
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:NReferences
This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
Requests has Insecure Temp File Reuse in its extract_zipped_paths() utility function
CVE-2026-25645 / GHSA-gc5v-m9x4-r6x2
More information
Details
Impact
The
requests.utils.extract_zipped_paths()utility function uses a predictable filename when extracting files from zip archives into the system temporary directory. If the target file already exists, it is reused without validation. A local attacker with write access to the temp directory could pre-create a malicious file that would be loaded in place of the legitimate one.Affected usages
Standard usage of the Requests library is not affected by this vulnerability. Only applications that call
extract_zipped_paths()directly are impacted.Remediation
Upgrade to at least Requests 2.33.0, where the library now extracts files to a non-deterministic location.
If developers are unable to upgrade, they can set
TMPDIRin their environment to a directory with restricted write access.Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:NReferences
This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
Requests has Insecure Temp File Reuse in its extract_zipped_paths() utility function
CVE-2026-25645 / GHSA-gc5v-m9x4-r6x2
More information
Details
Impact
The
requests.utils.extract_zipped_paths()utility function uses a predictable filename when extracting files from zip archives into the system temporary directory. If the target file already exists, it is reused without validation. A local attacker with write access to the temp directory could pre-create a malicious file that would be loaded in place of the legitimate one.Affected usages
Standard usage of the Requests library is not affected by this vulnerability. Only applications that call
extract_zipped_paths()directly are impacted.Remediation
Upgrade to at least Requests 2.33.0, where the library now extracts files to a non-deterministic location.
If developers are unable to upgrade, they can set
TMPDIRin their environment to a directory with restricted write access.Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:NReferences
This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
Release Notes
psf/requests (requests)
v2.33.0Compare Source
Announcements
uses Requests, please take a look at #7271. Give it a try, and report
any gaps or feedback you may have in the issue. 📣
Security
requests.utils.extract_zipped_pathsnow extractscontents to a non-deterministic location to prevent malicious file
replacement. This does not affect default usage of Requests, only
applications calling the utility function directly.
Improvements
Bugfixes
malformed authentication to be applied to Requests on
Python 3.11+. (#7205)
Deprecations
Documentation
v2.32.5Compare Source
Bugfixes
a new class of issues in Requests that have had negative impact across a number
of use cases. The Requests team has decided to revert this feature as long term
maintenance of it is proving to be unsustainable in its current iteration.
Deprecations
Configuration
📅 Schedule: (UTC)
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.
This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate.