[Infra] Update ubuntu GitHub runners

[martincostello]

Changes

• Upgrade from ubuntu-22.04 to ubuntu-24.04.
• Use ubuntu-24.04 instead of ubuntu-latest.

I can see in the dashboard that renovate is detecting the runner labels, but I don't know why it isn't trying to update them.

Merge requirement checklist

• CONTRIBUTING guidelines followed (license requirements, nullable enabled, static analysis, etc.)
• Unit tests added/updated
• Appropriate CHANGELOG.md files updated for non-trivial changes
• Changes in public API reviewed (if applicable)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.94%. Comparing base (7145855) to head (51c85cd).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7337      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.94%   89.94%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         276      276              
  Lines       14007    14007              
==========================================
- Hits        12599    12598       -1     
- Misses       1408     1409       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests-Project-Experimental	89.74% <ø> (-0.17%)	⬇️
unittests-Project-Stable	89.82% <ø> (-0.06%)	⬇️
unittests-Solution	89.75% <ø> (-0.12%)	⬇️
unittests-UnstableCoreLibraries-Experimental	47.19% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
see 7 files with indirect coverage changes

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR updates GitHub Actions workflow runner labels to explicitly use ubuntu-24.04 (including updating remaining ubuntu-22.04 and ubuntu-latest references), aligning CI execution environments on a consistent Ubuntu version.

Changes:

• Upgrade Ubuntu runner labels from ubuntu-22.04 to ubuntu-24.04 in matrix-based workflows.
• Replace ubuntu-latest with ubuntu-24.04 in several standalone workflow jobs.
• Update the reusable component build workflow default OS list and matrix exclusions to use ubuntu-24.04 / ubuntu-24.04-arm.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
.github/workflows/verifyaotcompat.yml	Updates the Ubuntu OS matrix entry to ubuntu-24.04.
.github/workflows/survey-on-merged-pr.yml	Pins the job runner from ubuntu-latest to ubuntu-24.04.
.github/workflows/ossf-scorecard.yml	Pins the Scorecard job runner from ubuntu-latest to ubuntu-24.04.
.github/workflows/fossa.yml	Pins the FOSSA scan job runner from ubuntu-latest to ubuntu-24.04.
.github/workflows/concurrency-tests.yml	Updates the Ubuntu OS matrix entry to ubuntu-24.04.
.github/workflows/Component.BuildTest.yml	Updates default OS list and net462 exclusions to ubuntu-24.04 / ubuntu-24.04-arm.
.github/workflows/codeql-analysis-steps.yml	Pins the results job runner from ubuntu-latest to ubuntu-24.04.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[thompson-tomo]

Fyi @martincostello reason renovate is not updating it is the version is not being extracted correctly by the regex. The version should not contain Ubuntu but use the number and potentially -arm. See ruby & ruby contrib for an example of where I have gotten it working.

[martincostello]

Thanks - I could find few examples when I searched GitHub for syntax that seemed to have evidence in the Git history of it working at some point when I added this to my own personal repositories, but as they were all already using up-to-date images I didn't see any evidence either way of it working or not. The changes were in anticipation of ubuntu-26.04 runners becoming available at some point.

[martincostello]

Your approach appears to be different in that it's matching to a conventional based property name and then the customManager telling it explicitly it's github-runners rather than using the comment-based syntax (based on my interpretation of this and this).

Ideally I'd like it work without needing to match to a specific matrix/property name and use the comment-hint as I think it's more declarative when you need to go outside of the defaults (like how Docker _VERSION support works).