PR #18603
facts: approved=False conflicts=no last_activity_age=3h
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver
PR #18601
facts: approved=False conflicts=no last_activity_age=5h
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver
PR #18599
facts: approved=False conflicts=no last_activity_age=5h
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver
PR #18598
facts: approved=False conflicts=no last_activity_age=7h
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver
PR #18596
facts: approved=False conflicts=no last_activity_age=7h
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver
PR #18589
facts: approved=True conflicts=no last_activity_age=1h
threads: author=1 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX85_pMHN -> author (The latest comment is from a reviewer/approver asking for the author's opinion while also saying they will update the file, so the author still needs to respond.)
route: author
PR #18585
facts: approved=False conflicts=no last_activity_age=8h
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver
PR #18575
facts: approved=True conflicts=yes last_activity_age=1h
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: maintainer
PR #18558
facts: approved=True conflicts=no last_activity_age=2h
threads: author=0 reviewer=1 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> reviewer (The latest comment is from the author saying they copied over the requested changes, so the ball is back with a reviewer to check/respond.)
route: maintainer
PR #18557
facts: approved=False conflicts=no last_activity_age=5h
threads: author=0 reviewer=2 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX85_Y9MR -> reviewer (The last comment is from the PR author replying to the reviewer’s suggestion, so the ball is back with the reviewer to acknowledge or continue the discussion.)
llm: pr-conversation -> reviewer (The author answered the reviewer’s request and pointed to a stacked PR for evaluation, so the ball is back with the reviewer to decide whether to include it.)
route: approver
PR #18530
facts: approved=False conflicts=no last_activity_age=1d
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver
PR #18524
facts: approved=False conflicts=no last_activity_age=2d
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver
PR #18511
facts: approved=False conflicts=no last_activity_age=2d
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver
PR #18498
facts: approved=False conflicts=no last_activity_age=2d
threads: author=0 reviewer=1 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX85_EdlS -> reviewer (The latest comment is from the author responding to the thread, so the ball is back with the reviewer to confirm or continue the review.)
route: approver
PR #18494
facts: approved=False conflicts=no last_activity_age=1d
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver
PR #18492
facts: approved=False conflicts=no last_activity_age=2d
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver
PR #18419
facts: approved=False conflicts=yes last_activity_age=4d
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver
PR #18405
facts: approved=True conflicts=no last_activity_age=5h
threads: author=3 reviewer=2 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX85-f0Q3 -> reviewer (The author replied to the version-limit concern with an explanation, so the ball is back with the reviewer to acknowledge or decide whether that’s acceptable.)
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX85-oQXb -> author (The latest comment is from the approver and is not a closing acknowledgement; it responds to the author’s explanation, so the author still owns the next reply if they want to continue the discussion.)
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX85_Z3ed -> author (An approver left a concrete code suggestion, so the PR author needs to apply or जवाब/respond to it.)
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX85_Z3eO -> reviewer (The author raised a concern and proposed an alternative approach, so the reviewer needs to respond to that suggestion.)
llm: pr-conversation -> author (The latest comment is from an approver with optional suggestions, so the PR author needs to respond or act on them.)
route: author
PR #18372
facts: approved=False conflicts=no last_activity_age=5d
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=1 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> external (Latest approver comment reports the failure to an upstream Gradle issue, so this thread is blocked on something outside the repository.)
route: external
PR #18298
facts: approved=False conflicts=no last_activity_age=22h
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver
PR #18291
facts: approved=False conflicts=no last_activity_age=5d
threads: author=0 reviewer=1 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX859v_UK -> reviewer (The latest comment is from the author responding with an explanation, so the ball is back with the reviewer to acknowledge or continue the review.)
route: approver
PR #18090
facts: approved=False conflicts=no last_activity_age=5d
threads: author=1 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> author (The latest comment is from an approver asking whether the code should use empty properties instead of `null`, so the PR author needs to जवाब/respond and likely adjust the implementation.)
route: author
PR #17816
facts: approved=False conflicts=no last_activity_age=7h
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=1 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> none (The approver clarified the comment was just from a local run and no action was requested, so the thread is effectively closed.)
route: approver
PR #17244
facts: approved=False conflicts=no last_activity_age=6h
threads: author=1 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> author (An approver’s last comment pointed to a patch with proposed simplifications, so the PR author needs to review and respond.)
route: author
PR #16390
facts: approved=True conflicts=no last_activity_age=7h
threads: author=0 reviewer=3 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX859nbZk -> reviewer (The reviewer asked a question, and the author replied with an explanation; the ball is back with the reviewer to confirm or continue the review.)
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX859nbwg -> reviewer (The reviewer asked a follow-up question, and the author answered it; the ball is back with the reviewer to confirm or continue the review.)
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX85_dkmB -> reviewer (The latest comment is by the author asking whether a StringBuilder replacement is preferred, so the reviewer needs to जवाब/confirm the preferred approach.)
route: maintainer
PR #16259
facts: approved=True conflicts=no last_activity_age=20h
threads: author=1 reviewer=1 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX85xfgvZ -> reviewer (The reviewer asked whether there should be a default extractor; the author replied with the implemented default and rationale, so the ball is back with the reviewer to review/acknowledge.)
llm: pr-conversation -> author (The latest comment is from the PR author saying they are still working on it, so the ball is still with the author.)
route: author
PR #15835
facts: approved=True conflicts=no last_activity_age=1d
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: maintainer
PR #15759
facts: approved=True conflicts=no last_activity_age=2d
threads: author=10 reviewer=1 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX85zhorc -> author (Latest comment is from an approver noting a convention the module should follow, so the PR author needs to respond or adjust the instrumentation default.)
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX858EBbi -> author (An approver left a build-related suggestion to reorder the `failsafe-3.0` entries alphabetically, so the PR author needs to update the file and respond.)
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX858EBbl -> author (The latest comment is an approver suggesting a code change (`drop onThrowable`), so the PR author needs to respond or apply it.)
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX858EBbq -> author (The latest comment is an approver’s style suggestion requesting a code change (`ignored` catch variable and remove comment), so the PR author needs to update the file.)
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX858EBbs -> author (The latest comment is from an approver and requests changes to the instrumentation (document the field coupling and tighten the muzzle range), so the PR author needs to act.)
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX858EBbt -> author (An approver requested a code change in the test file (remove `@Nullable` and its import), so the PR author needs to act.)
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX858EBbv -> author (The latest comment is an approver request to remove `@Nullable` from test code, so the PR author needs to update the file.)
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX858EBby -> author (The latest comment is an approver style suggestion with a concrete code fix, so the PR author needs to update the file or respond.)
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX858EBb0 -> author (An approver left a concrete style request to remove the leftover `// given` comment, so the PR author needs to make that change.)
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX858EBb1 -> author (The latest comment is a reviewer suggestion to remove shared Mockito dependencies, so the PR author needs to update the testing module or जवाब back.)
llm: PRRT_kwDODJKVX858EBbr -> reviewer (The author replied with a proposed solution and asked the reviewer whether it makes sense, so the ball is back with the reviewer.)
route: author
PR #15209
facts: approved=True conflicts=no last_activity_age=1d
threads: author=1 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> author (The latest comment is from the approver and raises a new concern about a breaking change plus possible implementation changes, so the PR author needs to respond and likely update the PR.)
route: author
PR #11068
facts: approved=False conflicts=yes last_activity_age=63d
threads: author=1 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> author (Reviewer asked the author to add a smoke test, and there’s no author follow-up; the later outsider bumps don’t change ownership.)
route: author
Note
Open non-draft PRs grouped by who is expected to act next. The grouping is partly performed by an LLM (source) and could contain mistakes. Refreshed about every hour. Last refresh: 2026-05-05 13:59 UTC.
Waiting on maintainers
Waiting on approvers
Waiting on authors
Waiting on external
Workflow failure tracking issues
Diagnostics
Approvers may force a refresh.