Skip to content

fix: upgrade next to 15.5.16 in examples#1967

Open
sonukapoor wants to merge 1 commit into
openai:mainfrom
sonukapoor:fix/upgrade-vulnerable-direct-deps
Open

fix: upgrade next to 15.5.16 in examples#1967
sonukapoor wants to merge 1 commit into
openai:mainfrom
sonukapoor:fix/upgrade-vulnerable-direct-deps

Conversation

@sonukapoor

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CVE Lite CLI (PR #1966) flagged next in the examples workspace at a version with known vulnerabilities. This upgrades it to 15.5.16, the current patched release.

@sonukapoor sonukapoor requested a review from a team as a code owner July 3, 2026 16:02

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f2dcf4c9e3

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread pnpm-workspace.yaml

allowBuilds:
'@swc/core': true
sharp: set this to true or false

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Resolve the sharp build approval placeholder

On clean installs this placeholder leaves sharp unreviewed: pnpm's official allowBuilds docs describe it as a map to explicitly allow (true) or disallow (false) script execution, and non-boolean entries are not converted into either allow or deny lists. Because this workspace has strictDepBuilds: true, adding Next 15's optional sharp dependency now makes pnpm install fail with ERR_PNPM_IGNORED_BUILDS until this is changed to sharp: true or sharp: false.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant