Skip to content

[LifeSci Skill] Bound target-evidence retrieval#377

Draft
phorward-deployed wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
ph/codex/life-science-bounded-retrieval
Draft

[LifeSci Skill] Bound target-evidence retrieval#377
phorward-deployed wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
ph/codex/life-science-bounded-retrieval

Conversation

@phorward-deployed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • add a bounded target-evidence workflow shared by the Entrez and ClinicalTrials.gov skills
  • define consistent evidence slots for biology, positive and negative programs, human safety, normal-tissue context, and preclinical evidence
  • batch selected PubMed records, reuse registry intervention aliases, and stop once the requested evidence categories are covered
  • keep the change instruction-only; the existing API wrappers are unchanged

Evaluation

Same-prompt local testing showed materially lower latency and tool fan-out for a single-target evidence review. Multi-target testing also reduced tool calls and context growth, although end-to-end wall time remained variable. This is a draft so the retrieval limits and evidence coverage can be evaluated across additional targets before landing.

Tests

  • quick_validate.py plugins/life-science-research/skills/ncbi-entrez-skill
  • quick_validate.py plugins/life-science-research/skills/clinicaltrials-skill
  • git diff --check

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant