[LifeSci Skill] Bound target-evidence retrieval#377
Draft
phorward-deployed wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Evaluation
Same-prompt local testing showed materially lower latency and tool fan-out for a single-target evidence review. Multi-target testing also reduced tool calls and context growth, although end-to-end wall time remained variable. This is a draft so the retrieval limits and evidence coverage can be evaluated across additional targets before landing.
Tests
quick_validate.py plugins/life-science-research/skills/ncbi-entrez-skillquick_validate.py plugins/life-science-research/skills/clinicaltrials-skillgit diff --check