Skip to content

Commit 96e320d

Browse files
Niels Wittrup Andersenlangecode
authored andcommitted
Fixed error in documentation (#1)
The documentation includes a + for a selection of two specific accounts, but the way the select parameters are parsed, the + becomes part of the first id provided.
1 parent badd3a9 commit 96e320d

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed
  • src/main/java/io/openapitools/api/capabilities

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

src/main/java/io/openapitools/api/capabilities/Select.java

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -13,9 +13,9 @@
1313
* <p>
1414
* Example:
1515
* <p>
16-
* {@code https://banking.services.sample-bank.dk/accounts?select="no::123456789+|no::234567890"}
16+
* {@code https://banking.services.sample-bank.dk/accounts?select="no::123456789|no::234567890"}
1717
* <p>
18-
* So the {@code select="no::123456789+|no::234567890" }
18+
* So the {@code select="no::123456789|no::234567890" }
1919
* will return the two accounts having account numbers "123456789" and "234567890" and
2020
* thus it works as a way to select certain objects, in this case based on the semantic
2121
* key for an account.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)