Skip to content

gRIBI scale: Nokia re-encap into a single tunnel#5664

Merged
rohit-rp merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
gribi_scale_nokia_repair_constraint
Jul 6, 2026
Merged

gRIBI scale: Nokia re-encap into a single tunnel#5664
rohit-rp merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
gribi_scale_nokia_repair_constraint

Conversation

@dracazacula

@dracazacula dracazacula commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Currently Nokia does not support yet repairing traffic through multiple backup tunnels; specifically multiple re-encap next-hops in a single next-hop-group are not supported.

The vendor has planned for the feature but in the meantime we need a workaround for the test.

@dracazacula dracazacula requested a review from a team as a code owner July 3, 2026 13:22
@dracazacula dracazacula requested a review from ram-mac July 3, 2026 13:22
@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the gRIBI scale testing logic to accommodate hardware-specific constraints regarding tunnel re-encapsulation. By adding a conditional check for Nokia devices, the test suite now correctly handles cases where multiple backup tunnels are not supported, preventing potential configuration errors during scale testing.

Highlights

  • Vendor-specific logic: Introduced a helper function to detect if a device supports re-encapsulation into multiple backup tunnels.
  • GRIBI configuration update: Modified the repair NHG generation logic to default to a single tunnel for Nokia devices, ensuring compatibility with current hardware limitations.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize the Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counterproductive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@OpenConfigBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Pull Request Functional Test Report for #5664 / 4e68837

No tests identified for validation.

Help

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a helper function repairReencapIntoMultipleBackupTunnels to conditionally bypass configuring multiple backup tunnels for vendors that do not support it (specifically Nokia). The reviewer recommends refactoring this vendor-specific check to use a deviation from the deviations package instead of directly calling dut.Vendor(), which aligns with the repository's style guidelines for maintaining test abstraction and portability.

Comment thread internal/cfgplugins/gribifullscale.go
@dracazacula dracazacula requested a review from rohit-rp July 6, 2026 13:51
@rohit-rp rohit-rp removed the request for review from ram-mac July 6, 2026 14:27
@rohit-rp rohit-rp merged commit 367fc4d into main Jul 6, 2026
22 checks passed
@rohit-rp rohit-rp deleted the gribi_scale_nokia_repair_constraint branch July 6, 2026 14:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants