Fix formatting of **Maintenance chart** in site_ops files

[sarina]

Before this change:

❯ python maintenance_chart_checker.py             

Maintenance Chart Analysis Report
================================

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Folder                         |    Total |    Empty |   Passed |   Failed |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| developers                     |       58 |       55 |        0 |        0 |
| documentors                    |       19 |       19 |        0 |        0 |
| educators                      |      337 |      258 |       62 |       15 |
| learners                       |       37 |       37 |        0 |        0 |
| translators                    |        8 |        8 |        0 |        0 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

After:

docs.openedx.org/source on 💁🏼‍♀️ fixup-ops-chart-formatting [$] via 🐍 v3.12.9 (vdocs.openedx.org) 
❯ python maintenance_chart_checker.py

Maintenance Chart Analysis Report
================================

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Folder                         |    Total |    Empty |   Passed |   Failed |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| developers                     |       58 |       55 |        0 |        0 |
| documentors                    |       19 |       19 |        0 |        0 |
| educators                      |      337 |      258 |       62 |       15 |
| learners                       |       37 |       37 |        0 |        0 |
| site_ops                       |      119 |       76 |        4 |       39 |
| translators                    |        8 |        8 |        0 |        0 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[sarina]

@jswope00 I wonder if we want to consider a third state (beyond "pass/fail") to indicate deprecated pages that will never pass. Maybe just "Deprecated"?

[jswope00]

@jswope00 I wonder if we want to consider a third state (beyond "pass/fail") to indicate deprecated pages that will never pass. Maybe just "Deprecated"?

how will we know it is deprecated? One thing this script does is it only includes pages where a maintenance table actually exists. That way, we don't count untestable pages like table of content or navigation pages. If we put any kind of note that isn't a maintenance table on a deprecated page then it won't be included. Does that suffice or would you rather they be in the final report?

[sarina]

I was just thinking about a third state in the maintenance table:

• Fail
• Pass
• Deprecated

and then updating the report script with another column. I think we'll be in a place where a previously Passed file may transition to Deprecated, and I don't think it's right to just remove the maintenance table in that case.

[sarina]

@jswope00 I added a separate commit to look at that allows us to have Deprecated pages. Take a look at the pages I've marked as Deprecated - does it make sense to you?

Maintenance Chart Analysis Report
================================

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Folder                         |    Total |    Empty |   Passed |   Failed | Deprecated |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| developers                     |       58 |       55 |        0 |        0 |          0 |
| documentors                    |       19 |       19 |        0 |        0 |          0 |
| educators                      |      337 |      258 |       62 |       15 |          0 |
| learners                       |       37 |       37 |        0 |        0 |          0 |
| site_ops                       |      119 |       75 |        4 |       22 |         39 |
| translators                    |        8 |        8 |        0 |        0 |          0 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[jswope00]

Nice!