Skip to content

Explain how credential issuer indicates cryptographic key binding is not required#714

Merged
Sakurann merged 3 commits into
openid:mainfrom
javereec:issue-700-explicit-no-binding-required
Apr 26, 2026
Merged

Explain how credential issuer indicates cryptographic key binding is not required#714
Sakurann merged 3 commits into
openid:mainfrom
javereec:issue-700-explicit-no-binding-required

Conversation

@javereec
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@javereec javereec commented Mar 5, 2026

Closes #700.

Changes applied to both 1.0 and 1.1

Comment thread 1.0/openid-4-verifiable-credential-issuance-1_0.md Outdated
Comment thread 1.1/openid-4-verifiable-credential-issuance-1_1.md Outdated
Co-authored-by: Paul Bastian <paul.bastian@posteo.de>
Co-authored-by: Jan Vereecken <ciao@janvereecken.com>
Comment thread 1.1/openid-4-verifiable-credential-issuance-1_1.md Outdated
Co-authored-by: Stefan Charsley <charsleysa@gmail.com>
@Sakurann Sakurann requested a review from charsleysa April 23, 2026 15:43
@Sakurann Sakurann merged commit 95c9ce3 into openid:main Apr 26, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Be more explicit around how Issuer signals that claim-based binding should be used/ no proof is required

4 participants