TRUNK-6550: Logging should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

[jwnasambu]

Description of what I changed

I updated logging statements to prevent log injection vulnerabilities by sanitizing untrusted input before writing it to logs. Specifically, carriage return (\r) and newline (\n) characters are replaced to prevent attackers from forging or manipulating log entries. This ensures log integrity and aligns with secure logging practices recommended by SonarQube and OWASP.

Issue I worked on

https://openmrs.atlassian.net/browse/TRUNK-6550

Checklist: I completed these to help reviewers :)

• My IDE is configured to follow the code style of this project.

  No? Unsure? -> configure your IDE, format the code and add the changes with git add . && git commit --amend

• I have added tests to cover my changes. (If you refactored
  existing code that was well tested you do not have to add tests)

  No? -> write tests and add them to this commit git add . && git commit --amend

• I ran mvn clean package right before creating this pull request and
  added all formatting changes to my commit.

  No? -> execute above command

• All new and existing tests passed.

  No? -> figure out why and add the fix to your commit. It is your responsibility to make sure your code works.

• My pull request is based on the latest changes of the master branch.

  No? Unsure? -> execute command git pull --rebase upstream master

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 56.75676% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 59.12%. Comparing base (708c62c) to head (2cad134).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...mrs/web/filter/initialization/TestInstallUtil.java	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
...org/openmrs/module/web/ModuleResourcesServlet.java	42.85%	3 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...ain/java/org/openmrs/module/web/ModuleServlet.java	81.81%	2 Missing ⚠️
...eb/filter/initialization/InitializationFilter.java	66.66%	2 Missing ⚠️
...va/org/openmrs/web/filter/update/UpdateFilter.java	50.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #6128      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     59.04%   59.12%   +0.07%     
- Complexity     9237     9254      +17     
============================================
  Files           693      693              
  Lines         37257    37271      +14     
  Branches       5485     5487       +2     
============================================
+ Hits          21999    22037      +38     
+ Misses        13287    13252      -35     
- Partials       1971     1982      +11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[jwnasambu]

@dkayiwa, @chibongho kindly feel free to review my PR at your convenient time please!