Describe the bug
👋 Hi!
We had a user who mistakenly introduced two calls to initOpenNextCloudflareForDev() in their config. They got an unintelligible workerd error:
*** Fatal uncaught kj::Exception: workerd/util/sqlite.c++:842: failed: SENTRY_DO SQLite failed; NOSENTRY database is locked: SQLITE_BUSY
stack: /repo/node_modules/@cloudflare/workerd-linux-64/bin/workerd@32c316b /repo/node_modules/@cloudflare/workerd-linux-64/bin/workerd@1fe0635 /repo/node_modules/@cloudflare/workerd-linux-64/bin/workerd@202b6b2 /repo/node_modules/@cloudflare/workerd-linux-64/bin/workerd@1febbec /repo/node_modules/@cloudflare/workerd-linux-64/bin/workerd@1feb642 /repo/node_modules/@cloudflare/workerd-linux-64/bin/workerd@1fa9412 /repo/node_modules/@cloudflare/workerd-linux-64/bin/workerd@2025b5f /repo/node_modules/@cloudflare/workerd-linux-64/bin/workerd@2028eb5 /repo/node_modules/@cloudflare/workerd-linux-64/bin/workerd@1f7b289 /repo/node_modules/@cloudflare/workerd-linux-64/bin/workerd@520c535 /repo/node_modules/@cloudflare/workerd-linux-64/bin/workerd@520ca58 /repo/node_modules/@cloudflare/workerd-linux-64/bin/workerd@520a51e /repo/node_modules/@cloudflare/workerd-linux-64/bin/workerd@520a31e /repo/node_modules/@cloudflare/workerd-linux-64/bin/workerd@1f62d15 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6@27249 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6@27304 /repo/node_modules/@cloudflare/workerd-linux-64/bin/workerd@1f62024
unhandledRejection MiniflareCoreError [ERR_RUNTIME_FAILURE]: The Workers runtime failed to start. There is likely additional logging output above.
at ignore-listed frames {
code: 'ERR_RUNTIME_FAILURE',
cause: undefined
}
The shouldContextInitializationRun guard protects duplicate invocations across processes, but in this scenario, both calls came from the same process.
We're happy to submit a patch if it's helpful. Two broad options I see:
- Expose a more user friendly error.
- Cache the initial value and return it on subsequent calls.
Steps to reproduce
import { initOpenNextCloudflareForDev } from "@opennextjs/cloudflare";
initOpenNextCloudflareForDev();
initOpenNextCloudflareForDev();
Expected behavior
An end user should be able to debug their error. If there's an invariant we can retain without their help, we do.
@opennextjs/cloudflare version
1.19.0
Wrangler version
4.82.1
next info output
Additional context
No response
Describe the bug
👋 Hi!
We had a user who mistakenly introduced two calls to
initOpenNextCloudflareForDev()in their config. They got an unintelligible workerd error:The
shouldContextInitializationRunguard protects duplicate invocations across processes, but in this scenario, both calls came from the same process.We're happy to submit a patch if it's helpful. Two broad options I see:
Steps to reproduce
Expected behavior
An end user should be able to debug their error. If there's an invariant we can retain without their help, we do.
@opennextjs/cloudflare version
1.19.0
Wrangler version
4.82.1
next info output
Additional context
No response