Skip to content

feat(egress): add DELETE /policy endpoint for removing egress rules by target#864

Merged
hittyt merged 4 commits into
opensandbox-group:mainfrom
Pangjiping:feat/egress-delete-policy
May 26, 2026
Merged

feat(egress): add DELETE /policy endpoint for removing egress rules by target#864
hittyt merged 4 commits into
opensandbox-group:mainfrom
Pangjiping:feat/egress-delete-policy

Conversation

@Pangjiping
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • Add DELETE handler that accepts a JSON array of target strings, removes matching rules case-insensitively, and commits the updated policy. Targets not found are silently ignored (idempotent). Spec and README docs updated.

Testing

  • Not run (explain why)
  • Unit tests
  • Integration tests
  • e2e / manual verification

Breaking Changes

  • None
  • Yes (describe impact and migration path)

Checklist

  • Linked Issue or clearly described motivation
  • Added/updated docs (if needed)
  • Added/updated tests (if needed)
  • Security impact considered
  • Backward compatibility considered

…y target

Add DELETE handler that accepts a JSON array of target strings, removes
matching rules case-insensitively, and commits the updated policy. Targets
not found are silently ignored (idempotent). Spec and README docs updated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Pangjiping Pangjiping force-pushed the feat/egress-delete-policy branch from 1bb5724 to 1e640a9 Compare May 11, 2026 09:17
@Pangjiping Pangjiping added feature New feature or request component/egress labels May 11, 2026
@Pangjiping Pangjiping marked this pull request as ready for review May 11, 2026 09:19
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 1e640a944c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread specs/egress-api.yaml
Pangjiping and others added 3 commits May 19, 2026 12:58
Wires the new DELETE /policy endpoint through Go, JavaScript, Python
(async + sync), Kotlin, and C# sandbox SDKs so users can remove egress
rules by target through the supported facades. Regenerates the JS and
Python OpenAPI clients (TypeScript and Kotlin generators now emit the
delete operation; Python generator produces a new delete_policy module),
then adds matching handwritten adapter/service/sandbox methods and unit
tests. Extends the C# HttpClientWrapper with a DeleteAsync(path, body,
ct) overload since DELETE-with-body was not previously supported.

Adds an async Python e2e test (test_01ac_network_policy_delete) that
provisions a sandbox with two allow rules, deletes one (plus a
nonexistent target to verify idempotency), and confirms the policy
mutation, defaultAction preservation, and resulting traffic behavior.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Drop Policy field from no-match path (consistent with POST/PATCH
  success responses and the spec's DELETE example).
- Return 500 instead of 400 for marshal/parse failures on
  self-synthesized policy JSON (internal inconsistency, not client
  error); upgrade matching log level to Error.
- Revert unrelated trailing-whitespace cleanup in smoke-nft.sh
  copyright header.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@hittyt hittyt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@hittyt hittyt merged commit 2240928 into opensandbox-group:main May 26, 2026
25 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants