-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 326
OTLP Source unified endpoint for logs, traces and metrics #5677
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
kkondaka
merged 27 commits into
opensearch-project:main
from
ps48:otel-telemetry-source
Jun 26, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
27 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8bd9b4e
init single endpoint
ps48 b73fca4
add reflection service
ps48 f209bff
update getmetadata expression to support eventType
ps48 48db7af
format files
ps48 2b0f4cd
update config and add health check
ps48 583a7c0
add http support and update config options
ps48 ddd9fe4
reset Otel trace source
ps48 c5f0b51
add tests for healthcheck, auth, requests and config
ps48 18cfe68
add tests for grpc
ps48 dda0cfa
update retry tests
ps48 2520c99
update plugin name from otel-telemetry-source to otlp
ps48 3886144
update readme with usage details
ps48 6afeaf1
reset Otel trace source changes
ps48 38a5beb
revert GetMetadataExpressionFunction and OTelTraceSource changes
ps48 725fc2a
remove example
ps48 763b0f2
update source to use http-common server
ps48 865dbd4
added back retry tests, use http-common health check
ps48 886f279
update readme with authentication details
ps48 91ffa90
fix checkstyle issues
ps48 1b75321
add support for OpenSearch formats & update readme
ps48 00027e4
remove dupe in settings
ps48 707889f
remove junit and mockito
ps48 41b18fb
update config fields and move certs
ps48 a2da4a0
update tests with new config options
ps48 10b0968
use data prepper duration and add generic output_format
ps48 3a9e7be
update timeouts to duration
ps48 c119aa8
update the output format defaults to null
ps48 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not so sure about the class name. To me this class looks like a factory of some kind and I would name it as such. But I am also fine with the name it got right now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Karsten,
The CreateServer abstaction was added in last week by this PR #5653. I can rename it
ServerFactoryor something similar, but I feel this can be out of scope for this PR.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I have seen when the change was introduced. I would appreciate a renaming at some point in time, but I am fine with not doing it in this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
agree with Karsten, need better name