Skip to content

OCPBUGS-87285: Updating ose-openstack-cinder-csi-driver-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0#402

Closed
openshift-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
openshift-bot:art-consistency-openshift-5.0-ose-openstack-cinder-csi-driver
Closed

OCPBUGS-87285: Updating ose-openstack-cinder-csi-driver-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0#402
openshift-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
openshift-bot:art-consistency-openshift-5.0-ose-openstack-cinder-csi-driver

Conversation

@openshift-bot

@openshift-bot openshift-bot commented Jun 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Updating ose-openstack-cinder-csi-driver-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
ose-openstack-cinder-csi-driver.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team
    in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
    a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
    canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
    only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
    a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
    canonical in product builds.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
  from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

  • In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
    set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
    To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
  • You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out in the #forum-ocp-art Slack channel.

@openshift-bot openshift-bot force-pushed the art-consistency-openshift-5.0-ose-openstack-cinder-csi-driver branch from e6a7606 to 1e62012 Compare June 6, 2026 04:14
@openshift-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the CI operator build configuration to downgrade the Go version used in the build root image from 1.26 to 1.25. This affects the release/openshift namespace's container image tag in the CI build pipeline.

Changes

Go version update in CI configuration

Layer / File(s) Summary
Build root image Go version update
.ci-operator.yaml
The build_root_image.tag for the release/openshift namespace is downgraded from rhel-9-release-golang-1.26-openshift-5.0 to rhel-9-release-golang-1.25-openshift-5.0.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 14 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ⚠️ Warning The title references updating a container image, but the actual changeset only updates a Go version in the build configuration file, not the container image itself. Update the title to reflect the actual change: updating the Go version from 1.26 to 1.25 in the .ci-operator.yaml build configuration.
✅ Passed checks (14 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed This PR only modifies .ci-operator.yaml (Go version tag change from 1.26 to 1.25). No test files are modified, so the Ginkgo test naming stability check does not apply.
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed This PR modifies only CI build configuration (.ci-operator.yaml) and configuration files, not Ginkgo test code. The check is not applicable to configuration-only changes.
Microshift Test Compatibility ✅ Passed The new Ginkgo e2e tests added (Manila/Cinder CSI tests) use only standard Kubernetes storage APIs, not OpenShift-specific APIs. These tests are MicroShift-compatible.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility ✅ Passed No new Ginkgo e2e tests are added in this PR. The PR only updates CI configuration; SNO check applies only when new e2e tests are added.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ✅ Passed PR modifies only .ci-operator.yaml (build config, Go 1.26→1.25). No deployment manifests, operator code, or controllers changed, so topology-aware scheduling check does not apply.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract ✅ Passed PR only modifies .ci-operator.yaml build configuration; no code changes affect OTE binary stdout contract (no main/init/suite code or logging configuration affected).
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ✅ Passed PR only modifies .ci-operator.yaml (build config), no new Ginkgo e2e tests added. Check is not applicable.
No-Weak-Crypto ✅ Passed PR only modifies .ci-operator.yaml with Go version tag change (1.26→1.25). No cryptographic code is introduced or modified; check is not applicable.
Container-Privileges ✅ Passed PR only modifies CI build configuration (Go version in .ci-operator.yaml), not container manifests. Privileged settings in storage drivers have legitimate justification.
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ✅ Passed PR only modifies .ci-operator.yaml to change Go build version from 1.26 to 1.25. No logging statements or sensitive data found in the change.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-bot openshift-bot changed the title Updating ose-openstack-cinder-csi-driver-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0 OCPBUGS-87285: Updating ose-openstack-cinder-csi-driver-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0 Jun 6, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from eshulman2 and stephenfin June 6, 2026 04:14
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-bot
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign gryf for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 6, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-87285, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (5.0.0) matches configured target version for branch (5.0.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Updating ose-openstack-cinder-csi-driver-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
ose-openstack-cinder-csi-driver.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team
    in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
    a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
    canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
    only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
    a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
    canonical in product builds.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

  • In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
    set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
    To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
  • You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out in the #forum-ocp-art Slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-87285, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (5.0.0) matches configured target version for branch (5.0.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
Details

In response to this:

Updating ose-openstack-cinder-csi-driver-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
ose-openstack-cinder-csi-driver.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team
    in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
    a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
    canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
    only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
    a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
    canonical in product builds.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

  • In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
    set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
    To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
  • You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out in the #forum-ocp-art Slack channel.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
  • Updated build configuration to use Go 1.25 release tag instead of the previous version.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In @.ci-operator.yaml:
- Line 4: The CI build_root Go version is out of sync: update the tag value
currently set as "rhel-9-release-golang-1.25-openshift-5.0" to a Go 1.26-aligned
image (e.g., switch to the rhel-9-release image that uses Go 1.26) or else make
go.mod and Docker/hack/make.sh all consistently target Go 1.25; specifically
edit the tag string in .ci-operator.yaml to match the Go toolchain declared in
go.mod (go 1.26.0) and update any Docker build args or references in
hack/make.sh to the same 1.26.x version so all CI/build assets use the same Go
version.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 32e60a0d-5912-4249-ba1a-6fee67665196

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f8bb599 and 1e62012.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .ci-operator.yaml

Comment thread .ci-operator.yaml
name: release
namespace: openshift
tag: rhel-9-release-golang-1.26-openshift-5.0
tag: rhel-9-release-golang-1.25-openshift-5.0

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

echo "== go.mod go directive =="
fd -a '^go\.mod$' --exec sed -n '1,20p' {}

echo
echo "== CI build root image tag(s) =="
fd -a '^\.ci-operator\.yaml$' --exec sed -n '1,80p' {}

echo
echo "== Other pinned Go versions in repo (for consistency check) =="
rg -n --no-heading -e 'go 1\.[0-9]+' -e 'golang:1\.[0-9]+' -e 'golang-1\.[0-9]+' Dockerfile go.mod hack/make.sh images/**/Dockerfile 2>/dev/null || true

Repository: openshift/cloud-provider-openstack

Length of output: 1039


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

echo "== Locate .ci-operator.yaml =="
fd -a --hidden '^\.ci-operator\.yaml$' -t f . || true

echo
echo "== .ci-operator.yaml first 30 lines =="
# Try printing the located file(s) if present
paths=$(fd -a --hidden '^\.ci-operator\.yaml$' -t f . || true)
if [ -n "${paths}" ]; then
  for p in $paths; do
    echo "--- ${p} ---"
    sed -n '1,30p' "$p"
  done
else
  echo "No .ci-operator.yaml found."
fi

echo
echo "== go.mod go directive (top 25 lines) =="
sed -n '1,25p' go.mod

echo
echo "== Other pinned Go versions in repo (consistency check) =="
rg -n --no-heading \
  -e 'go 1\.[0-9]+' \
  -e 'golang:1\.[0-9]+' \
  -e 'golang-1\.[0-9]+' \
  -S Dockerfile go.mod hack/make.sh images/**/Dockerfile 2>/dev/null || true

Repository: openshift/cloud-provider-openstack

Length of output: 1733


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

echo "== go.mod go directive =="
fd -a '^go\.mod$' --exec sed -n '1,20p' {}

echo
echo "== CI build root image tag(s) =="
fd -a --hidden '^\.ci-operator\.yaml$' --exec sed -n '1,80p' {}

echo
echo "== Other pinned Go versions in repo (consistency check) =="
rg -n --no-heading \
  -e 'go 1\.[0-9]+' \
  -e 'golang:1\.[0-9]+' \
  -e 'golang-1\.[0-9]+' \
  -S Dockerfile go.mod hack/make.sh .ci-operator.yaml --glob 'images/**/Dockerfile' 2>/dev/null || true

Repository: openshift/cloud-provider-openstack

Length of output: 1147


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

echo "== go.mod go directive =="
fd -a '^go\.mod$' --exec sed -n '1,20p' {}

echo
echo "== CI build root image tag(s) =="
fd -a --hidden '^\.ci-operator\.yaml$' --exec sed -n '1,80p' {}

echo
echo "== Other pinned Go versions in repo =="
rg -n --no-heading \
  -e 'go 1\.[0-9]+' \
  -e 'golang:1\.[0-9]+' \
  -e 'golang-1\.[0-9]+' \
  -S --glob 'images/**/Dockerfile' \
  Dockerfile go.mod hack/make.sh .ci-operator.yaml 2>/dev/null || true

Repository: openshift/cloud-provider-openstack

Length of output: 1127


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

echo "== go.mod =="
sed -n '1,10p' go.mod

echo
echo "== .ci-operator.yaml build_root_image.tag =="
sed -n '1,15p' .ci-operator.yaml | sed -n '1,10p'

echo
echo "== hack/make.sh golang:1.xx references =="
sed -n '1,60p' hack/make.sh | rg -n 'golang:1\.[0-9]+' || true

echo
echo "== root Dockerfile GOLANG_IMAGE =="
sed -n '1,40p' Dockerfile

Repository: openshift/cloud-provider-openstack

Length of output: 2611


Align CI build-root Go version with go.mod (1.26.0)

.ci-operator.yaml sets build_root_image.tag: rhel-9-release-golang-1.25-openshift-5.0, but go.mod declares go 1.26.0 (and repo Docker build args/images are on Go 1.26.2; hack/make.sh still references golang:1.25). Align these toolchain versions (either move CI/build assets to 1.26, or downgrade consistently to 1.25).

  tag: rhel-9-release-golang-1.25-openshift-5.0
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In @.ci-operator.yaml at line 4, The CI build_root Go version is out of sync:
update the tag value currently set as "rhel-9-release-golang-1.25-openshift-5.0"
to a Go 1.26-aligned image (e.g., switch to the rhel-9-release image that uses
Go 1.26) or else make go.mod and Docker/hack/make.sh all consistently target Go
1.25; specifically edit the tag string in .ci-operator.yaml to match the Go
toolchain declared in go.mod (go 1.26.0) and update any Docker build args or
references in hack/make.sh to the same 1.26.x version so all CI/build assets use
the same Go version.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-bot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/security 1e62012 link false /test security
ci/prow/verify-deps 1e62012 link true /test verify-deps
ci/prow/e2e-openstack 1e62012 link true /test e2e-openstack
ci/prow/unit 1e62012 link true /test unit

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

ART wants to connect issue OCPBUGS-87600 to this PR, but found it is currently hooked up to ['OCPBUGS-87285']. Please consult with #forum-ocp-art if it is not clear what there is to do.

@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-87285. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. All external bug links have been closed. The bug has been moved to the NEW state.

Details

In response to this:

Updating ose-openstack-cinder-csi-driver-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
ose-openstack-cinder-csi-driver.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team
    in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
    a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
    canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
    only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
    a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
    canonical in product builds.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

  • In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
    set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
    To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
  • You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out in the #forum-ocp-art Slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants