Skip to content

NE-2779: Implement Gateway API management mode#1474

Draft
rikatz wants to merge 2 commits into
openshift:masterfrom
rikatz:gateway-api-knob
Draft

NE-2779: Implement Gateway API management mode#1474
rikatz wants to merge 2 commits into
openshift:masterfrom
rikatz:gateway-api-knob

Conversation

@rikatz

@rikatz rikatz commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR creates a Gateway API management mode. It respects the API configuration, disabling the protection of CRDs for Gateway API but also the built-in Gateway API controllers in case a user decides to have an unmanaged Gateway API on their OpenShift cluster

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 15, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jun 15, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rikatz: This pull request references NE-2779 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

This PR creates a Gateway API management mode. It respects the API configuration, disabling the protection of CRDs for Gateway API but also the built-in Gateway API controllers in case a user decides to have an unmanaged Gateway API on their OpenShift cluster

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign grzpiotrowski for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 8111bf9f-041a-4e6f-83d7-d78564dd6ca8

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@rikatz rikatz force-pushed the gateway-api-knob branch 2 times, most recently from 9f062b5 to f784d5d Compare June 15, 2026 22:02
@rikatz rikatz force-pushed the gateway-api-knob branch from f784d5d to 2586edf Compare June 15, 2026 22:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants