Skip to content

[18.0-fr3] [OSPRH-17456] Fix namespace handling for operator references#1529

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openstack-k8s-operators:18.0-fr3from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-1527-to-18.0-fr3
Jul 10, 2025
Merged

[18.0-fr3] [OSPRH-17456] Fix namespace handling for operator references#1529
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openstack-k8s-operators:18.0-fr3from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-1527-to-18.0-fr3

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jul 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1527

/assign stuggi

Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-17456

@abays abays left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abays, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@abays

abays commented Jul 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hmm...

...
No resources found in openstack-operators namespace.
No resources found in openstack-operators namespace.
make: *** [Makefile:751: openstack_wait] Error 124
...

Let's see if it reproduces.

/test openstack-operator-build-deploy-kuttl

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit 3bebe64 into openstack-k8s-operators:18.0-fr3 Jul 10, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants