ACPI: property: Use ACPI functions in acpi_graph_get_next_endpoint() only

[ Upstream commit 5d01047 ]

Calling fwnode_get_next_child_node() in ACPI implementation of the fwnode
property API is somewhat problematic as the latter is used in the
impelementation of the former. Instead of using
fwnode_get_next_child_node() in acpi_graph_get_next_endpoint(), call
acpi_get_next_subnode() directly instead.

Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251001104320.1272752-3-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 29014a19d4176067b88aecc25a483fc525e1ef97)
Signed-off-by: Wentao Guan <guanwentao@uniontech.com>

Author: Sakari Ailus

drivers/acpi/property.c

@@ -1472,7 +1472,7 @@ static struct fwnode_handle *acpi_graph_get_next_endpoint(
 
 	if (!prev) {
 		do {
-			port = fwnode_get_next_child_node(fwnode, port);
+			port = acpi_get_next_subnode(fwnode, port);
 			/*
 			 * The names of the port nodes begin with "port@"
 			 * followed by the number of the port node and they also
@@ -1490,13 +1490,13 @@ static struct fwnode_handle *acpi_graph_get_next_endpoint(
 	if (!port)
 		return NULL;
 
-	endpoint = fwnode_get_next_child_node(port, prev);
+	endpoint = acpi_get_next_subnode(port, prev);
 	while (!endpoint) {
-		port = fwnode_get_next_child_node(fwnode, port);
+		port = acpi_get_next_subnode(fwnode, port);
 		if (!port)
 			break;
 		if (is_acpi_graph_node(port, "port"))
-			endpoint = fwnode_get_next_child_node(port, NULL);
+			endpoint = acpi_get_next_subnode(port, NULL);
 	}
 
 	/*