-
|
Hi everyone, These are my current settings. What is the best value for Record Size? Thank you |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
|
I’d probably keep For object storage, there isn’t one universally “best” value. It depends mostly on object size and access pattern:
Also, ZFS So imo: is a good default starting point. If most RustFS objects are large and mostly read sequentially, I’d test lmk what your typical object size is — that matters more than the storage backend itself 🙂 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Good to know, thanks for testing it.
For 5–10 MB chunks,
recordsize=1Mmakes sense. If you already see better IOPS/throughput with it, I’d keep1Mfor this RustFS dataset.Just keep in mind it mainly helps newly written data, so old data would need to be rewritten/copied to benefit from the new recordsize