Skip to content

PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
65 lines (49 loc) · 2.21 KB

PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

File metadata and controls

65 lines (49 loc) · 2.21 KB
Raw

Summary

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • New workflow file(s)
  • Tool or schema change
  • Docs / wiki only
  • CI / .github/ only
  • Other (describe)

Affected paths

Behavioural testing

  • Not applicable (tool / schema / docs change).
  • I imported and executed the affected workflow(s) in n8n (or the relevant framework). I described the environment and outcome below.

Behavioural testing notes:

Local validation (required for tool / schema / workflow PRs)

  • python tools/audit_workflows.py — no new secretFindings, no new invalidJsonFiles.
  • python tools/validate_generated_pack.py — ALL CHECKS PASSED (if the generated pack was touched).
  • python tools/validate_schemas.py — all gates PASS.
  • python tools/build_unified_catalog.py — runs cleanly.
  • python tools/build_review_queue.py — runs cleanly.
  • python tools/final_readiness_check.py — exit 0.

Safety checklist (hard requirements)

  • No real credentials, tokens, JWTs, API keys, bearer tokens, webhook URLs, customer emails, phone numbers, addresses, or other PII appear anywhere in this PR.
  • Placeholder hosts only (api.example.com, api.example.invalid, localhost).
  • No autonomous self-improvement language has been introduced.
  • No "production-ready", "behaviourally validated", "fully autonomous", or compliance-claim language has been introduced.
  • No AI attribution has been added to any generated file or to this PR description.
  • If this PR touches a regulated-domain workflow (healthcare / homecare / legal / finance / security), the admin-only notice is present and accurate.

Reviewer notes