-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy path05-result-pattern.html
More file actions
351 lines (322 loc) · 18.9 KB
/
Copy path05-result-pattern.html
File metadata and controls
351 lines (322 loc) · 18.9 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" />
<title>05 · Result Pattern — Multi-Tenant Platform</title>
<link rel="preconnect" href="https://fonts.googleapis.com" />
<link rel="preconnect" href="https://fonts.gstatic.com" crossorigin />
<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Inter:wght@400;500;600;700&family=Fraunces:opsz,wght@9..144,500;9..144,600&family=JetBrains+Mono:wght@400;500&display=swap" rel="stylesheet" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/prism/1.29.0/themes/prism-tomorrow.min.css" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../assets/styles.css" />
</head>
<body>
<div class="layout">
<aside class="sidebar">
<a href="../index.html" class="brand">
<span class="brand-mark">MTP</span>
<span class="brand-text">Multi-Tenant Platform</span>
</a>
<nav>
<div class="nav-group">
<h4>Foundations</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="../index.html"><span class="nav-num">00</span>Overview</a></li>
<li><a href="01-findings.html"><span class="nav-num">01</span>Findings</a></li>
<li><a href="02-architecture.html"><span class="nav-num">02</span>Architecture</a></li>
<li><a href="10-tenancy-model.html"><span class="nav-num">10</span>Tenancy Model</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="nav-group">
<h4>Validation</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="03-code-sketch.html"><span class="nav-num">03</span>Code Sketch</a></li>
<li><a href="04-ui-rule-config.html"><span class="nav-num">04</span>UI Rule Config</a></li>
<li><a href="05-result-pattern.html" class="active"><span class="nav-num">05</span>Result Pattern</a></li>
<li><a href="06-reconciliation.html"><span class="nav-num">06</span>Reconciliation</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="nav-group">
<h4>Tenant Surface</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="07-ui-schema.html"><span class="nav-num">07</span>UI Schema</a></li>
<li><a href="08-i18n-l10n.html"><span class="nav-num">08</span>i18n / l10n</a></li>
<li><a href="09-extension-fields.html"><span class="nav-num">09</span>Extension Fields</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="nav-group">
<h4>Frontend</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="../mockups/classic.html"><span class="nav-num">UI1</span>AppShell — Classic</a></li>
<li><a href="../mockups/zoho.html"><span class="nav-num">UI2</span>AppShell — 2-Stage</a></li>
<li><a href="../mockups/exam-setup.html"><span class="nav-num">UI3</span>AppShell — Exam Setup</a></li>
<li><a href="../mockups/ux-showcase-1.html"><span class="nav-num">UI4</span>AppShell — UX Showcase</a></li>
<li><a href="../mockups/ux-showcase-2.html"><span class="nav-num">UI5</span>AppShell — UX Showcase 2</a></li>
<li><a href="../mockups/ux-showcase-3.html"><span class="nav-num">UI6</span>AppShell — UX Showcase 3</a></li>
<li><a href="../mockups/ux-showcase-4.html"><span class="nav-num">UI8</span>AppShell — UX Showcase 4</a></li>
<li><a href="../mockups/ux-catalog.html"><span class="nav-num">UI7</span>UX Pattern Catalog</a></li>
<li><a href="../mockups/notes.html"><span class="nav-num">UIN</span>AppShell Notes</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="nav-group">
<h4>Decisions</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="../adr/0001-hybrid-validation-strategy.html"><span class="nav-num">ADR-1</span>Hybrid Validation</a></li>
<li><a href="../adr/0002-database-per-client.html"><span class="nav-num">ADR-2</span>DB-per-Client</a></li>
<li><a href="../adr/0003-frontend-stack.html"><span class="nav-num">ADR-3</span>Frontend Stack</a></li>
<li><a href="../adr/0004-authorization-permission-model.html"><span class="nav-num">ADR-4</span>Authz & Permissions</a></li>
<li><a href="../adr/0005-repo-topology.html"><span class="nav-num">ADR-5</span>Repo Topology</a></li>
<li><a href="../adr/0006-no-module-federation.html"><span class="nav-num">ADR-6</span>No Module Federation</a></li>
<li><a href="../adr/0007-ui-stack-radix-cssmodules.html"><span class="nav-num">ADR-7</span>UI Stack — Radix</a></li>
<li><a href="../adr/0008-mtp-web-folder-structure.html"><span class="nav-num">ADR-8</span>mtp-web Folder Structure</a></li>
<li><a href="../adr/0009-hr-payroll-three-aggregates.html"><span class="nav-num">ADR-9</span>HR-Payroll — 3 Aggregates, 1 Module</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="nav-group">
<h4>GNUMS — Conventions</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="../gnums/module-catalog.html"><span class="nav-num">MOD</span>Module Catalog</a></li>
<li><a href="../gnums/all-modules-inventory.html"><span class="nav-num">REF</span>Procedure Inventory</a></li>
<li><a href="../gnums/org-hierarchy.html"><span class="nav-num">ORG</span>Org Hierarchy</a></li>
<li><a href="../gnums/hierarchy-comparison.html"><span class="nav-num">CMP</span>Hierarchy Comparison</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="nav-group">
<h4>GNUMS — Modules</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="../gnums/methodology.html"><span class="nav-num">HOW</span>Study Methodology</a></li>
<li><a href="../gnums/accounting/scope.html"><span class="nav-num">ACC</span>Accounting — Scope</a></li>
<li><a href="../gnums/staff/scope.html"><span class="nav-num">STF</span>Staff — Scope</a></li>
<li><a href="../gnums/hr-payroll/scope.html"><span class="nav-num">HRP</span>HR-Payroll — Scope</a></li>
<li><a href="../gnums/exam/scope.html"><span class="nav-num">EXM</span>Exam — Scope</a></li>
<li><a href="../gnums/exam/strategy.html"><span class="nav-num">PLAY</span>Exam — Strategy</a></li>
<li><a href="../gnums/student/scope.html"><span class="nav-num">STU</span>Student — Scope</a></li>
<li><a href="../gnums/student/strategy.html"><span class="nav-num">SPL</span>Student — Strategy</a></li>
<li><a href="../gnums/student/cluster-01-core-identity.html"><span class="nav-num">SC1</span>Student / Core Identity</a></li>
<li><a href="../gnums/student/cluster-02-subordinate-entities.html"><span class="nav-num">SC2</span>Student / Subordinate Entities</a></li>
<li><a href="../gnums/student/cluster-03-master-config.html"><span class="nav-num">SC3</span>Student / Master & Config</a></li>
<li><a href="../gnums/student/cluster-04-certificate-workflow.html"><span class="nav-num">SC4</span>Student / Certificate Workflow</a></li>
<li><a href="../gnums/student/cluster-05-bvm-activities.html"><span class="nav-num">SC5</span>Student / NCC NSS Yoga</a></li>
<li><a href="../gnums/student/cluster-06-mentoring.html"><span class="nav-num">SC6</span>Student / Mentoring</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</nav>
</aside>
<main>
<span class="eyebrow">05 · Pattern</span>
<h1>Result pattern with three issue kinds</h1>
<p class="lede">
Validation results carry more than errors. Some issues block, some require user
acknowledgement, some are pure advisory. Three kinds. Names describe what the UI does, not
how loud the author wants to scream.
</p>
<div class="callout">
<strong>Note:</strong> the types on this page (<code>Result<T></code>,
<code>ValidationIssue</code>) are pedagogical — they describe the <em>principle</em>. For how
this lands inside the existing <code>ErrorOr</code> + <code>ValidationProblemDetails</code> +
<code>ApiController<TTokenData></code> house style, see
<a href="06-reconciliation.html">06 · Reconciliation</a>.
</div>
<h2>The wrong way</h2>
<p>Logging-flavoured severity enums (<code>Info / Hint / Suggestion / Warning / Error</code>) leak into validation results and create distinctions that no one — devs, admins authoring rules, end users — can pick correctly. "Severity" is the wrong word; it imports baggage from logging where the question is <em>how loud to scream</em>. In validation the question is <em>what does the UI do</em>.</p>
<h2>The right question</h2>
<p>Two orthogonal questions describe every possible validation outcome:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Does it block submission?</strong></li>
<li><strong>If it blocks, can the user override?</strong></li>
</ol>
<p>Three valid combinations. The fourth (doesn't block + overridable) is nonsense.</p>
<h2>The enum</h2>
<pre><code class="language-csharp">public enum IssueKind
{
Advisory, // surface, never blocks
Confirmable, // blocks until user acknowledges
Blocking // hard fail, no override
}
</code></pre>
<p>Names describe behavior. No numeric ranking, no severity word.</p>
<h2>Mapping real cases</h2>
<table>
<thead><tr><th>Real-world example</th><th>Kind</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr><td>Customer flagged for compliance review</td><td>Advisory</td></tr>
<tr><td>Auto-applied default term: 36 months</td><td>Advisory</td></tr>
<tr><td>Amount exceeds typical limit, confirm to proceed</td><td>Confirmable</td></tr>
<tr><td>Optional KYC field missing — can submit without</td><td>Confirmable</td></tr>
<tr><td>Credit score below tenant minimum</td><td>Blocking</td></tr>
<tr><td>Required field missing or out of range</td><td>Blocking</td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2>The issue record</h2>
<pre><code class="language-csharp">public sealed record ValidationIssue(
IssueKind Kind,
string Code, // stable, machine-readable, e.g. "Loan.AmountAboveTypical"
string Message, // human-readable, optionally localized server-side
string? Field = null, // null = form-level / cross-field
string? Source = null); // optional audit hint, e.g. "RuleEngine:rule-id-7c2..."
</code></pre>
<p>Four required fields. <code>Field</code> and <code>Source</code> optional. Resist the urge to add <code>MessageKey</code>, <code>Args</code>, <code>Category</code> until something concrete needs them.</p>
<h2>The result type</h2>
<pre><code class="language-csharp">public sealed class Result<T>
{
public bool IsSuccess { get; init; }
public T? Value { get; init; }
public IReadOnlyList<ValidationIssue> Issues { get; init; } = Array.Empty<ValidationIssue>();
public IEnumerable<ValidationIssue> Blocking => Issues.Where(i => i.Kind == IssueKind.Blocking);
public IEnumerable<ValidationIssue> Confirmable => Issues.Where(i => i.Kind == IssueKind.Confirmable);
public IEnumerable<ValidationIssue> Advisory => Issues.Where(i => i.Kind == IssueKind.Advisory);
public bool HasBlocking => Blocking.Any();
public bool RequiresAck => Confirmable.Any();
public static Result<T> Ok(T value, params ValidationIssue[] advisories) =>
new() { IsSuccess = true, Value = value, Issues = advisories };
public static Result<T> Fail(params ValidationIssue[] issues) =>
new() { IsSuccess = false, Issues = issues };
}
</code></pre>
<h2>Acknowledgement protocol</h2>
<p>The client submits with an optional set of acknowledged issue codes. The strategy treats a confirmable issue as blocking unless its code appears in the set.</p>
<pre><code class="language-csharp">public sealed class SubmitLoanApplicationRequest
{
public Guid CustomerId { get; init; }
public decimal Amount { get; init; }
public int TermMonths { get; init; }
public string Purpose { get; init; } = "";
public Dictionary<string, object?> ExtendedFields { get; init; } = new();
public IReadOnlySet<string>? AcknowledgedIssueCodes { get; init; }
}
</code></pre>
<pre><code class="language-csharp">public async Task<Result<Guid>> ExecuteAsync(
SubmitLoanApplicationRequest input, CancellationToken ct)
{
var binding = bindings.Get(FeatureKey)!;
var issues = (await rules.EvaluateAsync(binding.FlowVersionId, "Submit", input, ct)).Issues;
var ack = input.AcknowledgedIssueCodes ?? new HashSet<string>();
var unacknowledged = issues.Where(i =>
i.Kind == IssueKind.Confirmable && !ack.Contains(i.Code)).ToList();
var blocking = issues.Where(i => i.Kind == IssueKind.Blocking).ToList();
if (blocking.Count > 0 || unacknowledged.Count > 0)
return Result<Guid>.Fail([..blocking, ..unacknowledged]);
var advisories = issues.Where(i => i.Kind == IssueKind.Advisory).ToArray();
var application = LoanApplication.Create(/* ... */);
await repo.AddAsync(application, ct);
return Result<Guid>.Ok(application.Id, advisories);
}
</code></pre>
<div class="callout">
<strong>Critical:</strong> never trust the acknowledgement set to <em>skip</em> evaluation.
Server always re-runs all rules. The ack list only changes whether a confirmable issue counts
as blocking. If a stale client sends an ack for a code the server no longer produces, the ack
is ignored.
</div>
<h2>HTTP mapping</h2>
<table>
<thead><tr><th>Case</th><th>Status</th><th>Body</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr><td>Shape validation fail (FluentValidation)</td><td>400</td><td>RFC 7807 problem details</td></tr>
<tr><td>Success, no issues</td><td>200 / 201</td><td><code>{ data, issues: [] }</code></td></tr>
<tr><td>Success with advisories</td><td>200 / 201</td><td><code>{ data, issues: [advisories] }</code></td></tr>
<tr><td>Confirmable issues, unacknowledged</td><td>409 Conflict</td><td><code>{ issues, requiresAcknowledgement: true }</code></td></tr>
<tr><td>Blocking issues</td><td>422 Unprocessable Entity</td><td><code>{ issues }</code></td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>409 is chosen so clients can reliably branch: <em>"open acknowledgement modal, resubmit with ack codes"</em>. 422 means "fix the data". 200 means "we're done; here are some things to note".</p>
<h2>Two-phase validation (recommended)</h2>
<div class="mermaid">
graph LR
A[Client edits form] --> B[POST /api/.../validate]
B --> C[Server runs full pipeline]
C --> D[Returns issues, no persist]
D --> E{Any blocking?}
E -->|yes| F[Show errors inline]
E -->|no, has confirmable| G[Show confirm modal]
E -->|no, advisory only| H[Show banner notes]
G -->|user confirms| I[POST /api/... with ack codes]
F -->|user fixes| A
H --> I
I --> J[Server persists]
</div>
<ul>
<li><code>POST /api/<feature>/validate</code> — full pipeline, never persists, returns <code>Result<T></code> with <code>Value</code> null.</li>
<li><code>POST /api/<feature></code> — persists if <code>!HasBlocking</code> and all confirmable codes are acknowledged.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Controller mapping helper</h2>
<pre><code class="language-csharp">public static class ResultExtensions
{
public static IActionResult ToActionResult<T>(
this Result<T> result,
ControllerBase controller,
Func<T, IActionResult> onSuccess)
{
if (result.IsSuccess)
return onSuccess(result.Value!);
if (result.HasBlocking)
return controller.UnprocessableEntity(new
{
issues = result.Issues.Select(Format)
});
// Only confirmable issues outstanding
return controller.Conflict(new
{
requiresAcknowledgement = true,
issues = result.Issues.Select(Format)
});
}
private static object Format(ValidationIssue i) => new
{
kind = i.Kind.ToString(),
code = i.Code,
message = i.Message,
field = i.Field
};
}
</code></pre>
<h2>Rule engine wiring</h2>
<p>The <code>RULE</code> table drops the integer <code>Severity</code> column in favour of a <code>Kind</code> column storing <code>"Advisory"</code>, <code>"Confirmable"</code>, or <code>"Blocking"</code>.</p>
<pre><code class="language-json">{
"id": "amount-above-typical",
"field": "Amount",
"operator": "lte",
"value": 1000000,
"kind": "Confirmable",
"code": "Loan.AmountAboveTypical",
"message": "Amount exceeds typical range — please confirm"
}
</code></pre>
<p>Admin UI rule editor exposes a <em>Kind</em> dropdown with three options. No numeric severity, no separate "bypassable" checkbox.</p>
<h2>Per-tenant kind overrides</h2>
<p>Same rule, Tenant A treats as <code>Confirmable</code>, Tenant B treats as <code>Blocking</code>. Two options:</p>
<ol>
<li>Duplicate the rule under Tenant B's flow version with a different <code>Kind</code>. Costs storage; trivially auditable.</li>
<li>Add a <code>RULE_KIND_OVERRIDE</code> table keyed by <code>(FlowVersionId, RuleId) → Kind</code>. Saves duplication; one more join.</li>
</ol>
<p>Prefer (1) until duplication actually hurts. Flow versions are already the unit of variation — leaning on them keeps the model simple.</p>
<h2>Audit</h2>
<p>Every persisted submission stores the acknowledged issue codes at the moment of submission. If a confirmable rule's wording changes later, the audit trail still shows what the user agreed to.</p>
<h2>What we deliberately left out</h2>
<table>
<thead><tr><th>Field</th><th>Why omitted</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr><td><code>MessageKey</code> / <code>Args</code> for i18n</td><td>Localize server-side or with an i18n catalog keyed on <code>Code</code>. Don't pollute the wire format until a real i18n requirement lands.</td></tr>
<tr><td><code>Category</code></td><td><code>Code</code>'s prefix already groups (<code>Loan.X</code>, <code>Compliance.Y</code>). Don't add a second taxonomy.</td></tr>
<tr><td>Priority / display order</td><td>UI sorts by <code>Kind</code> then <code>Field</code> then declaration order. Sufficient.</td></tr>
<tr><td><code>Importance</code> orthogonal axis</td><td>Speculative. Add only when a real screen needs it.</td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="doc-footer">
<a href="04-ui-rule-config.html">
<span class="label">← Previous</span>
<span class="title">04 · UI Rule Config</span>
</a>
<a href="06-reconciliation.html" class="next">
<span class="label">Next</span>
<span class="title">06 · Reconciliation →</span>
</a>
</div>
</main>
</div>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/prism/1.29.0/components/prism-core.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/prism/1.29.0/plugins/autoloader/prism-autoloader.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/mermaid@10/dist/mermaid.min.js"></script>
<script>mermaid.initialize({ startOnLoad: true, theme: 'default' });</script>
</body>
</html>