Hi authors,I would like to ask whether the metrics in your paper, including PSR, FID, PSNR, and SSIM, were measured under the replacement model setting, that is, with --is_obfuscation set to False. Also, I think my way of calculating PSR might be different from yours. As I understand it, the test images are divided into four groups, each corresponding to a test image (choosing different outfits of the same target person). Then, for each test model like IR152, we evaluate the four groups separately and take the average of the four results. The same method is applied to the other three models (only on the CelebA-HQ dataset). Using this method, the metrics I get are much higher than yours. I would greatly appreciate it if you could clarify.
Hi authors,I would like to ask whether the metrics in your paper, including PSR, FID, PSNR, and SSIM, were measured under the replacement model setting, that is, with --is_obfuscation set to False. Also, I think my way of calculating PSR might be different from yours. As I understand it, the test images are divided into four groups, each corresponding to a test image (choosing different outfits of the same target person). Then, for each test model like IR152, we evaluate the four groups separately and take the average of the four results. The same method is applied to the other three models (only on the CelebA-HQ dataset). Using this method, the metrics I get are much higher than yours. I would greatly appreciate it if you could clarify.