Skip to content

refactor: Bump eslint from 10.3.0 to 10.7.0 - #262

Merged
mtrezza merged 1 commit into
parse-community:mainfrom
mtrezza:refactor/eslint-10.7.0
Jul 20, 2026
Merged

refactor: Bump eslint from 10.3.0 to 10.7.0#262
mtrezza merged 1 commit into
parse-community:mainfrom
mtrezza:refactor/eslint-10.7.0

Conversation

@mtrezza

@mtrezza mtrezza commented Jul 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Bumps eslint from 10.3.0 to 10.7.0.

Replacement for the Dependabot PR (rebased onto the current main, exact-pinned).

Closes #261

Changes

  • Dev dependency eslint bumped 10.3.010.7.0 (routine minor).
  • Transitively updates eslint's own sub-deps in the lockfile: @eslint/config-helpers 0.5.50.6.0, @eslint/plugin-kit 0.7.10.7.2.

Breaking Changes

  • None affecting this project. Minor release within the 10.x line; npm run lint passes with no new violations (no new default-on rules break the build).

Code Changes Required

  • None. Only package.json and package-lock.json changed.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the ESLint development tooling to a newer version.
    • Refreshed related linting packages to maintain compatibility and improve tooling support.

@parse-github-assistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚀 Thanks for opening this pull request! We appreciate your effort in improving the project. Please let us know once your pull request is ready for review.

Tip

  • Keep pull requests small. Large PRs will be rejected. Break complex features into smaller, incremental PRs.
  • Use Test Driven Development. Write failing tests before implementing functionality. Ensure tests pass.
  • Group code into logical blocks. Add a short comment before each block to explain its purpose.
  • We offer conceptual guidance. Coding is up to you. PRs must be merge-ready for human review.
  • Our review focuses on concept, not quality. PRs with code issues will be rejected. Use an AI agent.
  • Human review time is precious. Avoid review ping-pong. Inspect and test your AI-generated code.

Note

Please respond to review comments from AI agents just like you would to comments from a human reviewer. Let the reviewer resolve their own comments, unless they have reviewed and accepted your commit, or agreed with your explanation for why the feedback was incorrect.

Caution

Pull requests must be written using an AI agent with human supervision. Pull requests written entirely by a human will likely be rejected, because of lower code quality, higher review effort and the higher risk of introducing bugs. Please note that AI review comments on this pull request alone do not satisfy this requirement. Our CI and AI review are safeguards, not development tools. If many issues are flagged, rethink your development approach. Invest more effort in planning and design rather than using review cycles to fix low-quality code.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Important

Review skipped

No new commits to review since the last review.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: f04b0823-98aa-447a-8edb-1279ef1eae8d

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The development ESLint dependency was upgraded from 10.3.0 to 10.7.0. The lockfile now records the matching ESLint package and updated @eslint/config-helpers and @eslint/plugin-kit versions.

Changes

ESLint Toolchain Upgrade

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update ESLint versions
package.json, package-lock.json
The development dependency and lockfile entry for ESLint were updated to 10.7.0, with locked metadata for @eslint/config-helpers 0.6.0 and @eslint/plugin-kit 0.7.2.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 7
✅ Passed checks (7 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly matches the PR’s main change: bumping eslint from 10.3.0 to 10.7.0.
Description check ✅ Passed The description includes the issue, approach, and impact, so it is mostly complete despite not using the exact template headings.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Security Check ✅ Passed Only package.json/package-lock.json changed; no code paths. The known @eslint/plugin-kit advisory affects <0.3.4, while this PR uses 0.7.2.
Engage In Review Feedback ✅ Passed No actionable review feedback is present in the provided context; the PR notes none was substantive, so the check is not applicable.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@mtrezza

mtrezza commented Jul 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
✅ Action performed

Review finished.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (6006efe) to head (819f7fd).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #262   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            4         4           
  Lines          159       159           
=========================================
  Hits           159       159           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@mtrezza

mtrezza commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Action performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@mtrezza

mtrezza commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
✅ Action performed

Review finished.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Caution

Failed to replace (edit) comment. This is likely due to insufficient permissions or the comment being deleted.

Error details
No server is currently available to service your request. Sorry about that. Please try resubmitting your request and contact us if the problem persists.

1 similar comment
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Caution

Failed to replace (edit) comment. This is likely due to insufficient permissions or the comment being deleted.

Error details
No server is currently available to service your request. Sorry about that. Please try resubmitting your request and contact us if the problem persists.

@mtrezza
mtrezza merged commit 814a530 into parse-community:main Jul 20, 2026
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant