refactor: Bump brace-expansion (security)

[mtrezza]

Resolves the brace-expansion advisory from #269 (the @babel/cli 7→8 part is deferred — see #265).

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the locked dependency entries to newer patch versions.
  • Refreshed associated package metadata, including resolved URLs and integrity hashes.

[parse-github-assistant]

🚀 Thanks for opening this pull request! We appreciate your effort in improving the project. Please let us know once your pull request is ready for review.

Tip

• Keep pull requests small. Large PRs will be rejected. Break complex features into smaller, incremental PRs.
• Use Test Driven Development. Write failing tests before implementing functionality. Ensure tests pass.
• Group code into logical blocks. Add a short comment before each block to explain its purpose.
• We offer conceptual guidance. Coding is up to you. PRs must be merge-ready for human review.
• Our review focuses on concept, not quality. PRs with code issues will be rejected. Use an AI agent.
• Human review time is precious. Avoid review ping-pong. Inspect and test your AI-generated code.

Note

Please respond to review comments from AI agents just like you would to comments from a human reviewer. Let the reviewer resolve their own comments, unless they have reviewed and accepted your commit, or agreed with your explanation for why the feedback was incorrect.

Caution

Pull requests must be written using an AI agent with human supervision. Pull requests written entirely by a human will likely be rejected, because of lower code quality, higher review effort and the higher risk of introducing bugs. Please note that AI review comments on this pull request alone do not satisfy this requirement. Our CI and AI review are safeguards, not development tools. If many issues are flagged, rethink your development approach. Invest more effort in planning and design rather than using review cycles to fix low-quality code.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 196278b5-79c4-4f16-abaf-097346b5e9fa

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a7c9d78 and 704443c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• package-lock.json

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• package-lock.json

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The lockfile updates top-level brace-expansion from 5.0.5 to 5.0.7 and the nested glob entry from 1.1.13 to 1.1.16, including their resolved URLs and integrity hashes.

Changes

Dependency lock updates

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update brace-expansion lock entries package-lock.json	Updates the top-level and nested brace-expansion entries with newer versions and corresponding resolution metadata.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

---

Caution

Pre-merge checks failed

Please resolve all errors before merging. Addressing warnings is optional.

• Ignore

❌ Failed checks (1 error, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	❌ Error	The description is too brief and missing the template's Issue, Approach, and Tasks sections.	Add the required headings, link the closing issue, summarize the approach, and include the task checklist items as needed.
Engage In Review Feedback	❓ Inconclusive	No review-feedback threads or replies are visible; the PR page shows 'No reviews,' so engagement can't be verified from this checkout.	Provide the PR review conversation or GitHub comments showing feedback, your reply, and either an implementation commit or the reviewer’s retraction.

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title matches the required prefix and clearly describes the brace-expansion security bump.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Security Check	✅ Passed	Only dependency-lock updates were made, and the new brace-expansion versions (5.0.7, 1.1.16) are above affected ranges in published advisories. citeturn0search4turn0search6turn0search10

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (ecdd7b4) to head (704443c).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #271   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            4         4           
  Lines          159       159           
=========================================
  Hits           159       159           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.