Update UX writing guide to add relevant guidance for using other companies terms/trademarked phrases. Pull whatever from here is actually relevant for PF:
"It is ok to use our competitors trademarks so long as:
It is used accurately to describe the other party’s own goods and
services, and all of the following conditions are met:
- It is not misleading;
- It compares goods or services meeting the same needs or intended
for the same purpose;
- It objectively compares one or more material, relevant, verifiable
and representative features of those goods or services,
- It does not create confusion in the marketplace between Red Hat and
a VMWare;
- It does not discredit or denigrate the trademarks, trade names or
other distinguishing signs of a competitor;
- It does not take unfair advantage of the trademark or other
distinguishing sign of a competitor; and
- It does not present goods or services as imitations or replicas of
goods or services bearing a trademark.
We may not use a competitor’s trademark as an attention-getting device. We
should use them in the body text only and avoid using them in headlines,
titles, and graphics. We always need permission to use a third party's
logo."
Jira Issue: PF-1837
Update UX writing guide to add relevant guidance for using other companies terms/trademarked phrases. Pull whatever from here is actually relevant for PF:
"It is ok to use our competitors trademarks so long as:
It is used accurately to describe the other party’s own goods and
services, and all of the following conditions are met:
for the same purpose;
and representative features of those goods or services,
a VMWare;
other distinguishing signs of a competitor;
distinguishing sign of a competitor; and
goods or services bearing a trademark.
We may not use a competitor’s trademark as an attention-getting device. We
should use them in the body text only and avoid using them in headlines,
titles, and graphics. We always need permission to use a third party's
logo."
Jira Issue: PF-1837