Skip to content

Format code#630

Merged
artemgavrilov merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
format-code
Mar 25, 2026
Merged

Format code#630
artemgavrilov merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
format-code

Conversation

@artemgavrilov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@artemgavrilov artemgavrilov commented Mar 10, 2026

Description

Just apply formatting to the codebase.

Links

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Mar 10, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.96%. Comparing base (1b6b7cb) to head (dad0653).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #630      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.81%   85.96%   +0.14%     
==========================================
  Files           3        3              
  Lines        1354     1354              
  Branches      218      218              
==========================================
+ Hits         1162     1164       +2     
+ Misses         91       90       -1     
+ Partials      101      100       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Remove handwritten typedefs list in favor of autogenerated. Generated
file doesn't cover enum typenames but it seems fine as PostgreSQL
codebase lacks this as well.
Use only autogenerated typedefs for code formatting.
Apply code foratting to .pl files
@artemgavrilov artemgavrilov marked this pull request as ready for review March 25, 2026 12:40
@artemgavrilov artemgavrilov merged commit b6ffd37 into main Mar 25, 2026
28 checks passed
@artemgavrilov artemgavrilov deleted the format-code branch March 25, 2026 13:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants