Skip to content

Add LLVM bitcode to .gitignore#645

Merged
jeltz merged 2 commits intopercona:mainfrom
jeltz:ignore-bc
Apr 7, 2026
Merged

Add LLVM bitcode to .gitignore#645
jeltz merged 2 commits intopercona:mainfrom
jeltz:ignore-bc

Conversation

@jeltz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jeltz jeltz commented Apr 7, 2026

Also makes sure to change some paths in .gitignore to absolute.

jeltz added 2 commits April 7, 2026 09:11
By making paths absolute we make the intent for what is to be ignored
clearer.
@jeltz jeltz changed the title Add LLVM byte code to .gitignore Add LLVM bitcode to .gitignore Apr 7, 2026
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 7, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.32%. Comparing base (44b9bb7) to head (426fff9).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #645   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.32%   86.32%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines        1346     1346           
  Branches      217      217           
=======================================
  Hits         1162     1162           
  Misses         87       87           
  Partials       97       97           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@artemgavrilov artemgavrilov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I prefer handwritten gitignores over generated ones, so maybe it worth to cleanup it later and remove what we don't need there. What do you think?

@jeltz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jeltz commented Apr 7, 2026

Agreed, I was thinking about cleaning it up and only having what we need but I decided to keep it simple for now.

@jeltz jeltz merged commit d763b41 into percona:main Apr 7, 2026
50 of 51 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants