You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Discharge the single remaining genuine analytic input of GJ §17.5 Lemma 17.5.2
upper side: the derivative-limit provider Lemma_17_5_2_DerivativeLimitProvider,
i.e. local uniform convergence of the finite-volume β-derivative profiles F_n(β) = ∂_β⟨σ_xσ_z⟩_{Λ_n} to the infinite-volume derivative g'(β).
After #2931 (decay/clustering/susceptibility, now complete) and the conditional
reduction (#2929–#2942), this is the only remaining input: it is the
finite-volume → infinite-volume convergence rate of the β-derivatives, distinct
from the (already-built) spatial decay of the infinite-volume correlation.
Background
The conditional capstone lemma_17_5_2_capstone_of_poly_geometric_increments_on_covered_stages_and_pseudoMass_le_rate
(Add poly-geometric fully-concrete capstone (rate infra Phase 3) #2942) reduces the full sandwich to: a summable/geometric bound on the
consecutive β-derivative increments |F_{k+1}(β) − F_k(β)|, plus m⁻(β₂) ≤ -log(β₂J·2d).
The increment F_{k+1} − F_k is a difference of finite Lebowitz edge sums over
the different induced graphs G_{k+1} and G_k; the naive finite-volume
distance decay carries a divergent 2^(edge count) prefactor.
The mechanism is a finite-volume Simon–Lieb / coupling difference identity: corr_∞{x,z} − corr_{Λ_n}{x,z} is controlled by boundary terms ∑_{b ∈ ∂Λ_n} corr_∞{x,b}·corr_∞{b,z}, which the (now-built) infinite-volume
spatial decay makes summable and small.
Phase A (orig): finite-volume vs infinite-volume correlation difference identity /
bound via a separating-surface (ball-boundary) Simon–Lieb step on the box Λ_n.
Phase B (partial, PR Add unconditional high-temp convolution summability (Issue #2965 Phase B) #2966 boundary-sum summability): bound the boundary sum by the infinite-volume spatial decay
(correlationInfinite_latticeGraph_le_contractionFactor_pow_dist_pair, _susceptibility_summable) → geometric/summable volume-convergence rate of the
correlations.
Phase C: transfer the correlation convergence rate to the β-derivative
increments (the Lebowitz edge-sum difference), giving the |F_{k+1}−F_k| ≤ M·(2k+3)^d·ratio^k input.
Phase D: feed lemma_17_5_2_capstone_of_poly_geometric_increments_on_covered_stages_and_pseudoMass_le_rate
and close Lemma 17.5.2 Step 117l-e/f.
References
Glimm–Jaffe, Quantum Physics (2nd ed.), §5.1 pp. 74–79, §17.5 Lemma 17.5.2
pp. 311–312; §17.8.
Purpose
Discharge the single remaining genuine analytic input of GJ §17.5 Lemma 17.5.2
upper side: the derivative-limit provider
Lemma_17_5_2_DerivativeLimitProvider,i.e. local uniform convergence of the finite-volume β-derivative profiles
F_n(β) = ∂_β⟨σ_xσ_z⟩_{Λ_n}to the infinite-volume derivativeg'(β).After #2931 (decay/clustering/susceptibility, now complete) and the conditional
reduction (#2929–#2942), this is the only remaining input: it is the
finite-volume → infinite-volume convergence rate of the β-derivatives, distinct
from the (already-built) spatial decay of the infinite-volume correlation.
Background
lemma_17_5_2_capstone_of_poly_geometric_increments_on_covered_stages_and_pseudoMass_le_rate(Add poly-geometric fully-concrete capstone (rate infra Phase 3) #2942) reduces the full sandwich to: a summable/geometric bound on the
consecutive β-derivative increments
|F_{k+1}(β) − F_k(β)|, plusm⁻(β₂) ≤ -log(β₂J·2d).F_{k+1} − F_kis a difference of finite Lebowitz edge sums overthe different induced graphs
G_{k+1}andG_k; the naive finite-volumedistance decay carries a divergent
2^(edge count)prefactor.corr_∞{x,z} − corr_{Λ_n}{x,z}is controlled by boundary terms∑_{b ∈ ∂Λ_n} corr_∞{x,b}·corr_∞{b,z}, which the (now-built) infinite-volumespatial decay makes summable and small.
Tracking (PRs)
bound via a separating-surface (ball-boundary) Simon–Lieb step on the box
Λ_n.(
correlationInfinite_latticeGraph_le_contractionFactor_pow_dist_pair,_susceptibility_summable) → geometric/summable volume-convergence rate of thecorrelations.
increments (the Lebowitz edge-sum difference), giving the
|F_{k+1}−F_k| ≤ M·(2k+3)^d·ratio^kinput.lemma_17_5_2_capstone_of_poly_geometric_increments_on_covered_stages_and_pseudoMass_le_rateand close Lemma 17.5.2 Step 117l-e/f.
References
pp. 311–312; §17.8.