-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.1k
zend_types: Convert HT_*() macros to inline functions
#22305
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
TimWolla
wants to merge
1
commit into
php:master
Choose a base branch
from
TimWolla:zend-types-ht-demacro
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+108
−82
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is related but does not block the PR: can we adopt this naming convention?
sizeof(T).Ts, except whereTis 1 byte).We blur them currently. For example,
idx(index) is used here but this is a byte offset operation:Index is also used here, and it really is an index:
See this somewhat recent blog post from TigerBeetle about it:

https://tigerbeetle.com/blog/2026-02-16-index-count-offset-size/
I realize it's a lot of work to fix this all over, and there would need to be short-term compatibility macros/functions with deprecation comments explaining it, but perhaps by 9.0 we can have this sorted out?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On 64-bit versions it's actually an index, so I think renaming it here would actually cause more confusion.
Not sure if we have many other places where we are using confusing terminology. The best solution probably is for you to send a PR to master - just like I'm doing for the macro conversion.