Go through BEP google doc making sure that issues we discussed about AND THEIR MOTIVATION are represented and reported correctly

[smoia]

Google doc of the BEP is wildly outdated like jellied moose nose.

This issue tracks all other issues and discussion we had that should be reported on the BEP google doc to update it.

To check items off this list, edit the Google doc (to match the discussion on the Github issue) using SUGGESTED CHANGES mode.

• What to do with sparse / non-continuous data ? #5
• Remove coverage of EMG #7
• recording-<label> vs acq-<label> #9
• Distinguishing "raw" from "derivative" (meta)data #11, although Major rewriting of BIDS spec from BEP #49 attempts it we might want to add something in the appendix (similarly to MP2RAGE)
• Wording of PhysioType: specified #21
• Metadata field to clarify relative timing of concurrently-acquired data groups #23 and Submit a PR to the main BIDS spec on scans.tsv/concurrency #42, although if we are opening a PR for Submit a PR to the main BIDS spec on scans.tsv/concurrency #42, we just need to make sure that:
  • we don't reference another solution in text for the moment
  • once that PR is merged, we make sure the text is harmonic to that
• Which entity-label pairs do we need in a physio file standing on its own (i.e. in its own modality)? #48, referencing physio as data type vs modality #13
• Naming conventions for EDA data #38

[m-miedema]

I took a crack at revising section 2.3 in the BEP doc to harmonize with #11, perhaps we can talk about whether an appendix is necessary at our next meeting!

Edit: done, suggested changes were discussed and accepted!