Skip to content

docs: clarify documentation workflow#6739

Open
abdollahShahid wants to merge 1 commit intopipe-cd:masterfrom
abdollahShahid:docs-readme-workflow-clarification
Open

docs: clarify documentation workflow#6739
abdollahShahid wants to merge 1 commit intopipe-cd:masterfrom
abdollahShahid:docs-readme-workflow-clarification

Conversation

@abdollahShahid
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR makes a small clarification update to docs/README.md. It fixes a few wording issues, updates the versioned docs example from docs-v0.x.x to the more general docs-vX.Y.x, and makes the docs contribution workflow section easier to read.

Refs #6679

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 4, 2026 08:13
@abdollahShahid abdollahShahid requested review from a team as code owners May 4, 2026 08:13
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Note

Copilot was unable to run its full agentic suite in this review.

Clarifies the documentation contribution workflow in docs/README.md, including updating the versioned docs example to a generalized docs-vX.Y.x.

Changes:

  • Fixes wording/grammar in the intro and workflow sections.
  • Updates the versioned docs path example from docs-v0.x.x to docs-vX.Y.x.
  • Tweaks local Hugo prerequisite wording.

Comment thread docs/README.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/README.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/README.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/README.md Outdated
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Abdullah Shahid <108458621+abdollahShahid@users.noreply.github.com>
@abdollahShahid abdollahShahid force-pushed the docs-readme-workflow-clarification branch from 2ea72ea to c3a4626 Compare May 4, 2026 08:35
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Ayushmore1214 Ayushmore1214 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

great work @abdollahShahid LGTM!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants