Do not expose information via relationfield serializer

[maethu]

Description
The relationfield serializer should respect the View permission.

Problem
Some metadata like, Title and Description can be exposed thru the relationsfield serializer

Reproduce

1. Create 3 pages
2. Refer to page 2 and 3 from page 1 via relatedItems
3. Remove View permission for page 2, or page 3 (You can simply publish page 1 and for example page 2 and keep page 3 private)

Result: bot page 2 and page 3 are serialized in relatedItems

...
    "relatedItems": [
        {
            "@id": "http://localhost:8080/Plone/page-2",
            "@type": "Document",
            "UID": "4f0b980e8a144a55b9244b8b942e93d2",
            "description": "",
            "image_field": null,
            "image_scales": null,
            "review_state": "published",
            "title": "Page 2"
        },
        {
            "@id": "http://localhost:8080/Plone/page-3",
            "@type": "Document",
            "UID": "bec10b954049433088df076e6eb0208d",
            "description": "",
            "image_field": null,
            "image_scales": null,
            "review_state": "private",
            "title": "Page 3"
        }
    ],
...

Expected result
Only list accessible relatedItems and do not expose any metadata information

...
    "relatedItems": [
        {
            "@id": "http://localhost:8080/Plone/page-2",
            "@type": "Document",
            "UID": "4f0b980e8a144a55b9244b8b942e93d2",
            "description": "",
            "image_field": null,
            "image_scales": null,
            "review_state": "published",
            "title": "Page 2"
        }
    ],
...

[davisagli]

@maethu In general, permission to view an object's metadata in listings is controlled by the "Access contents information" permission on its container, not the View permission.

Does the Anonymous role still have the Access contents information permission in your example above? If so, I think this is working as designed.

[maethu]

@maethu In general, permission to view an object's metadata in listings is controlled by the "Access contents information" permission on its container, not the View permission.

Does the Anonymous role still have the Access contents information permission in your example above? If so, I think this is working as designed.

Ohh ooops my bad... Should have known this. But I it still exposes information even without this permission. --> #1635 (comment)