Skip to content

Fix for Issue #183: MailMerge and totally unrelated nested fields#185

Open
johannes-tenschert wants to merge 1 commit into
plutext:masterfrom
johannes-tenschert:master
Open

Fix for Issue #183: MailMerge and totally unrelated nested fields#185
johannes-tenschert wants to merge 1 commit into
plutext:masterfrom
johannes-tenschert:master

Conversation

@johannes-tenschert

Copy link
Copy Markdown

These changes for MailMerge ignore and preserve nested fields
that may or may not contain MERGEFIELDs.

Nested fields in an imported docx can cause a stack overflow
in FieldRef.java:304 (which logs the detection of nested fields...).

These changes for MailMerge ignore and preserve nested fields
that may or may not contain MERGEFIELDs.

Nested fields in an imported docx can cause a stack overflow
in FieldRef.java:304 (which logs the detection of nested fields...).
@bschalme

bschalme commented May 5, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Will the conflicts be resolved and this PR merged anytime soon? I just ran across this very issue with docx4j 8.3.4, and this PR looks like it will solve it.

@goeh

goeh commented Sep 16, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The stack overflow problem (because of recursive logging statement) is still present in 11.4.8

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants