Skip to content

BorringSSL Fork#2342

Open
AnDevi wants to merge 5 commits into
pocoproject:poco-1.10.0from
AnDevi:BoringSSLFork
Open

BorringSSL Fork#2342
AnDevi wants to merge 5 commits into
pocoproject:poco-1.10.0from
AnDevi:BoringSSLFork

Conversation

@AnDevi

@AnDevi AnDevi commented May 21, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Those are changes necessary to build Poco Library with BoringSSL instead of OpenSSL.
I tested that it's works on MacOs.

@aleks-f aleks-f left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1.9.0 has already been released, please send this pull to 1.9.1

Comment thread Crypto/src/CipherKeyImpl.cpp Outdated
case EVP_CIPH_CCM_MODE:
return MODE_CCM;
//Changed for port OpenSSL -> BoringSSL
#if defined(OPENSSL_IS_BORINGSSL)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why this?

throw NotImplementedException();
#else
std::string friendlyName;
f(pCert)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I doubt this will compile

//Changed for port OpenSSL -> BoringSSL
#if defined(OPENSSL_IS_BORINGSSL)
dh->p = BN_bin2bn(dh1024_p, sizeof(dh1024_p), 0);
dh->g = BN_bin2bn(dh1024_g, sizeof(dh1024_g), 0);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no need to set dh->length here?

@obiltschnig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Please re-target pull request against poco-1.10.0 branch.

@AnDevi
AnDevi changed the base branch from poco-1.9.0 to poco-1.10.0 October 23, 2019 08:37
@aleks-f aleks-f added this to the Unspecified milestone Jun 21, 2022
@aleks-f

aleks-f commented Dec 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@matejk not urgent, put on TODO list

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants