Skip to content

Commit 50519b8

Browse files
committed
Update Discourse data data [skip ci]
1 parent 7b65a51 commit 50519b8

2 files changed

Lines changed: 10 additions & 10 deletions

File tree

assets/data/faq.json

Lines changed: 3 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
11
{
22
"source": "preCICE Discourse (FAQ)",
3-
"generated_at": "2026-03-08T06:38:08.163708",
3+
"generated_at": "2026-03-09T06:57:45.169559",
44
"topics": [
55
{
66
"id": 44,
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
2121
"url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/can-precice-be-used-for-volume-coupling/27",
2222
"created_at": "2019-09-23T20:55:55.190Z",
2323
"last_posted_at": "2025-08-11T13:12:45.035Z",
24-
"views": 3257,
24+
"views": 3258,
2525
"posts_count": 10,
2626
"like_count": 2,
2727
"excerpt": "I read that you do surface coupling?\nDo you support volume coupling too?"
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
3333
"url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/restarting-coupled-fsi-simulation-with-precice/117",
3434
"created_at": "2019-12-06T09:10:16.329Z",
3535
"last_posted_at": "2024-07-03T15:56:51.883Z",
36-
"views": 2344,
36+
"views": 2346,
3737
"posts_count": 11,
3838
"like_count": 5,
3939
"excerpt": "Dear all,\nI am trying to validate my fluid and structure mesh for the FSI1 case of cylinder-flap test. As the refinement of the fluid and structure mesh increases, it is difficult for implicit FSI coupling to converge. Therefore, my idea is to use a \u2026"

assets/data/news.json

Lines changed: 7 additions & 7 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
11
{
2-
"generated_at": "2026-03-08T06:38:04.361171",
2+
"generated_at": "2026-03-09T06:57:41.984276",
33
"topics": [
44
{
55
"id": 2795,
@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@
88
"url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/we-need-help-from-experienced-precice-users-on-github-precice-at-gsoc/2795",
99
"created_at": "2026-03-02T10:27:03.317Z",
1010
"last_posted_at": "2026-03-02T11:36:29.923Z",
11-
"like_count": 8,
11+
"like_count": 9,
1212
"posts_count": 2,
13-
"views": 105,
13+
"views": 113,
1414
"description": "Dear preCICE Community, tl;dr: we need the help of experienced community members in reviewing an unprecedented amount of community contributions on GitHub. If you always wanted to actively contribute, but..."
1515
},
1616
{
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
2222
"last_posted_at": "2020-07-19T20:56:04.638Z",
2323
"like_count": 0,
2424
"posts_count": 2,
25-
"views": 797,
25+
"views": 798,
2626
"description": "News, announcements, \u201cblog\u201d-like posts..."
2727
},
2828
{
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@
142142
"last_posted_at": "2025-04-07T04:59:59.909Z",
143143
"like_count": 4,
144144
"posts_count": 4,
145-
"views": 195,
145+
"views": 196,
146146
"description": "Summary: We have been developing a JSON schema for preCICE adapters and tools improving interoperability and enabling tooling support. Find out more about the schema and what you can do..."
147147
},
148148
{
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@
166166
"last_posted_at": "2025-01-21T14:44:05.322Z",
167167
"like_count": 2,
168168
"posts_count": 1,
169-
"views": 75,
169+
"views": 76,
170170
"description": "Summary: We updated the guidelines for adapters (v0.2) and application cases (v0.2). We switched from a \u201cbronze-silver-gold\u201d tiering system to \u201crequired-additional\u201d, made the goals of these guidelines and the listing..."
171171
},
172172
{
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@
274274
"last_posted_at": "2024-02-27T09:42:45.629Z",
275275
"like_count": 8,
276276
"posts_count": 4,
277-
"views": 1031,
277+
"views": 1032,
278278
"description": "The longer you wait for something, the more you appreciate it, right? preCICE v3 is finally out and we are pretty happy about it. v3.0.0 is a breaking release. This..."
279279
},
280280
{

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)