Skip to content

Commit d66fc96

Browse files
committed
Update Discourse data data [skip ci]
1 parent 7cc45bc commit d66fc96

2 files changed

Lines changed: 19 additions & 19 deletions

File tree

assets/data/faq.json

Lines changed: 17 additions & 17 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
11
{
22
"source": "preCICE Discourse (FAQ)",
3-
"generated_at": "2026-05-19T09:36:30.577969",
3+
"generated_at": "2026-05-20T09:24:29.257222",
44
"topics": [
55
{
66
"id": 44,
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
4545
"url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/can-precice-be-used-with-moving-meshes/53",
4646
"created_at": "2019-10-14T12:30:50.463Z",
4747
"last_posted_at": "2024-06-06T02:01:13.798Z",
48-
"views": 1599,
48+
"views": 1600,
4949
"posts_count": 29,
5050
"like_count": 7,
5151
"excerpt": "What happens when the interface is moving?"
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
8181
"url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/can-precice-be-used-with-gpus-or-other-accelerator-cards/822",
8282
"created_at": "2021-12-08T11:09:10.769Z",
8383
"last_posted_at": "2023-05-10T15:52:06.292Z",
84-
"views": 926,
84+
"views": 928,
8585
"posts_count": 6,
8686
"like_count": 4,
8787
"excerpt": "My target system features GPUs or other accelerator cards.\nCan preCICE use them to accelerate the simulation?"
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@
165165
"url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/can-precice-be-used-for-one-way-coupling/28",
166166
"created_at": "2019-09-23T20:58:29.741Z",
167167
"last_posted_at": "2020-04-27T11:07:12.123Z",
168-
"views": 2676,
168+
"views": 2677,
169169
"posts_count": 5,
170170
"like_count": 0,
171171
"excerpt": "Can I couple two participants one-way?"
@@ -225,10 +225,10 @@
225225
"url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/can-precice-interpolate-between-unstructured-and-structured-meshes/56",
226226
"created_at": "2019-10-14T12:37:35.342Z",
227227
"last_posted_at": "2019-10-14T12:37:54.840Z",
228-
"views": 506,
228+
"views": 507,
229229
"posts_count": 2,
230230
"like_count": 0,
231-
"excerpt": "Or: Can preCICE interpolate between an arbitrary / unstructured mesh and a regular / structured mesh?"
231+
"excerpt": ""
232232
},
233233
{
234234
"id": 55,
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@
240240
"views": 478,
241241
"posts_count": 2,
242242
"like_count": 0,
243-
"excerpt": "I always hear that monolithic coupling is the only way to go, as partitioned coupling introduces error. Is this correct?"
243+
"excerpt": ""
244244
},
245245
{
246246
"id": 54,
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@
252252
"views": 518,
253253
"posts_count": 2,
254254
"like_count": 0,
255-
"excerpt": "Can the individual solvers run on two different platforms on two different machines in/out of a network?"
255+
"excerpt": ""
256256
},
257257
{
258258
"id": 52,
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@
264264
"views": 519,
265265
"posts_count": 2,
266266
"like_count": 0,
267-
"excerpt": "Which code is executing the coupling iterations given that preCICE does not really have a centralized engine to orchestrate the simulation?"
267+
"excerpt": ""
268268
},
269269
{
270270
"id": 26,
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@
276276
"views": 592,
277277
"posts_count": 2,
278278
"like_count": 0,
279-
"excerpt": "How do you test preCICE and its official adapters?\nCan I trust you?"
279+
"excerpt": ""
280280
},
281281
{
282282
"id": 50,
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@
288288
"views": 850,
289289
"posts_count": 2,
290290
"like_count": 0,
291-
"excerpt": "There are multiple OpenFOAM \u201cvariants\u201d, including openfoam.com, openfoam.org, and the early fork foam-extend. Which versions of them are compatible?"
291+
"excerpt": ""
292292
},
293293
{
294294
"id": 43,
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@
300300
"views": 1010,
301301
"posts_count": 3,
302302
"like_count": 0,
303-
"excerpt": "Marta asked on the mailing list (March 28, 2019)\n\nI\u2019m using preCICE to couple two codes: the lattice Boltzmann code LUMIS and OpenFOAM. LUMIS has a time step 10 times smaller than OpenFOAM so during the coupling LUMIS subcycles before exchanging data\u2026"
303+
"excerpt": ""
304304
},
305305
{
306306
"id": 29,
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@
312312
"views": 822,
313313
"posts_count": 2,
314314
"like_count": 0,
315-
"excerpt": "My solver offers adaptive mesh refinement.\nCan I use this with preCICE?"
315+
"excerpt": ""
316316
},
317317
{
318318
"id": 38,
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@
324324
"views": 1135,
325325
"posts_count": 3,
326326
"like_count": 1,
327-
"excerpt": "A preCICE developer told me to try a \u201cPR\u201d (Pull Request). What is this and how do I try it?"
327+
"excerpt": ""
328328
},
329329
{
330330
"id": 42,
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@
336336
"views": 758,
337337
"posts_count": 7,
338338
"like_count": 0,
339-
"excerpt": "We had a good discussion with Satish on the mailing list about the re-partitioning process and the connection to parallel data mapping in preCICE.\nSatish asked (July 24, 2019):\n\nIt seems to me that mappings can occur in parallel in preCICE. Is that c\u2026"
339+
"excerpt": ""
340340
},
341341
{
342342
"id": 41,
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@
348348
"views": 751,
349349
"posts_count": 2,
350350
"like_count": 2,
351-
"excerpt": "Nikrouz asked on the mailing list (Sep 13, 2019):\n\nI am going to use OpenFoam-CalculiX for FSI simulations.\nAt this time, I am have technical question for preparing preCICE config file. The case I am going to run has very large deformations. Fortunat\u2026"
351+
"excerpt": ""
352352
},
353353
{
354354
"id": 36,
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@
360360
"views": 647,
361361
"posts_count": 2,
362362
"like_count": 0,
363-
"excerpt": "The OpenFOAM adapter has the form of an OpenFOAM function object. This mechanism is commonly used only for post-processing, so a reasonable question is:\n\nDoes the OpenFOAM adapter also take care of the checkpointing? In other words, can a function ob\u2026"
363+
"excerpt": ""
364364
}
365365
]
366366
}

assets/data/news.json

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
11
{
2-
"generated_at": "2026-05-19T09:36:21.192284",
2+
"generated_at": "2026-05-20T09:24:25.234403",
33
"topics": [
44
{
55
"id": 217,
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@
106106
"last_posted_at": "2025-10-22T10:52:31.506Z",
107107
"like_count": 7,
108108
"posts_count": 4,
109-
"views": 344,
109+
"views": 346,
110110
"description": "Dear preCICE community, Some of you are already experimenting with just\u2011in\u2011time data mapping and other features introduced in preCICE v3.2. In my recently completed thesis, Flexible mesh\u2011particle coupling with preCICE,..."
111111
},
112112
{

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)