Skip to content

Perpendicular flap: Document a stronger coupling condition#539

Merged
MakisH merged 8 commits into
developfrom
strong-coupled-flap
Aug 1, 2025
Merged

Perpendicular flap: Document a stronger coupling condition#539
MakisH merged 8 commits into
developfrom
strong-coupled-flap

Conversation

@Fujikawas
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

With this change the coupling becomes stronger for the perpendicular flap case. It will require implicit coupling AND acceleration methods to converge. With $\rho=42$, it requires only implicit coupling, no acceleration is necessary. With current $\rho=3000$, both explicit and implicit coupling could lead to convergence.
With $\rho=1$, the result from fluid-openfoam-solid-dealii looks like:
image
With $\rho=42$, the result from fluid-openfoam-solid-dealii looks like:
image

Checklist:

  • I added a summary of any user-facing changes (compared to the last release) in the changelog-entries/<PRnumber>.md.
  • I will remember to squash-and-merge, providing a useful summary of the changes of this PR.

@Fujikawas Fujikawas marked this pull request as draft June 10, 2024 09:03
@uekerman
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Worth considering on top: We could make the fluid inflow time-dependent. Then, also the $\rho=3000$ scenario could look interesting again.

@MakisH
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

MakisH commented Jun 27, 2024

@Fujikawas please add in a comment the new figures you got in the context of https://github.com/MakisH/ofw19-training

@MakisH MakisH self-assigned this Jul 17, 2025
@MakisH
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

MakisH commented Jul 17, 2025

This has high educational value, as it demonstrates a case in which implicit coupling is important.
To not trigger a cascade of side changes that require a lot of effort, let's convert this to a documentation note, encouraging the user to try a different density and observe the effect. (@Fujikawas)

@MakisH MakisH assigned Fujikawas and unassigned MakisH Jul 17, 2025
@Fujikawas Fujikawas marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2025 08:26
@Fujikawas Fujikawas requested a review from MakisH July 30, 2025 08:26
MakisH added 3 commits July 31, 2025 21:16
Implicit coupling without acceleration is not well-motivated and rather confuses.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@MakisH MakisH left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I directly fixed a few issues and removed the intermediate step of ρ=42 and no acceleration, as that I think is more confusing than helps.

Current rendering:

Screenshot from 2025-07-31 21-26-50

@MakisH MakisH changed the title Make the coupling stronger in perpendicular flap case Perpendicular flap: Document a stronger coupling condition Aug 1, 2025
@MakisH MakisH merged commit fd64e0c into develop Aug 1, 2025
1 check passed
@MakisH MakisH deleted the strong-coupled-flap branch August 1, 2025 12:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants