RHOAIENG-27175: add RayCluster name validation#1003
Conversation
|
@DavidAdaRH: This pull request references RHOAIENG-27175 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@DavidAdaRH: This pull request references RHOAIENG-27175 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1003 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 95.97% 95.98% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 23 23
Lines 2211 2217 +6
==========================================
+ Hits 2122 2128 +6
Misses 89 89 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
chipspeak
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM David and cheers for this! Love me a good regex!
rh-pre-commit.version: 2.3.2 rh-pre-commit.check-secrets: ENABLED
32ce84a to
150ffdd
Compare
|
@DavidAdaRH: This pull request references RHOAIENG-27175 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@DavidAdaRH: This pull request references RHOAIENG-27175 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@DavidAdaRH: This pull request references RHOAIENG-27175 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: chipspeak, kryanbeane The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
300c9c4
into
project-codeflare:main
Issue link
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-27175
What changes have been made
Added validation for the RayCluster name field. Invalid names now raise a ValueError instead of surfacing as an API error.
Verification steps
Checks