chore: release main#1514
Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: cf608295ac
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
github-actions
Bot
force-pushed
the
release-please--branches--main
branch
from
6e68bd6 to
12c5cac
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e85975af7a
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
Performance BenchmarksCompared
|
github-actions
Bot
force-pushed
the
release-please--branches--main
branch
2 times, most recently
from
bb79e6c to
4e1dcd9
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: bb79e6cd36
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: d97608e485
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
github-actions
Bot
force-pushed
the
release-please--branches--main
branch
2 times, most recently
from
c1a4641 to
0ad68e5
Compare
|
Release QA follow-up pushed in 2d230b9:
Targeted validation passed: root and standalone |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 2d230b95e0
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
Follow-up pushed in 0e5c087 after CI exposed a release-ordering issue: the temporary root minimum of modelaudit-picklescan>=0.1.6 made Docker/package installation fail because 0.1.6 is not available on PyPI until this release publishes. Restored the existing >=0.1.4,<0.2.0 floor and removed the corresponding changelog/docs claim. The valid Cargo.lock synchronization, targeted Release Please lock selectors, and duplicate Unreleased cleanup remain. Targeted checks: Prettier and git diff --check pass; cargo metadata --locked reports 0.1.6. Local uv 0.11.17 still proposes unrelated resolver churn, while CI's Lock File Consistency check passed on the previous commit; no generated lock rewrite was retained. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 0e5c0872e4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
Follow-up pushed in 9e1b4dd: restored one active top-level |
|
Added one final targeted regression in c11cbd9 to assert every configured root, standalone, and Rust lockfile selector remains present in release-please-config.json. Local targeted validation: 7 tests passed in tests/test_release_workflow.py; Ruff and mypy clean for that file; Prettier clean for both changelogs and the release config; release-please 17.3.0 GenericToml updated exactly one intended entry in each lockfile. No full suite was run. |
github-actions
Bot
force-pushed
the
release-please--branches--main
branch
from
9e70b70 to
f4a4213
Compare
github-actions
Bot
force-pushed
the
release-please--branches--main
branch
from
e218389 to
1a97f3b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b3fd6f5aa8
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| # CI environments may have variable performance; use generous thresholds | ||
| # to avoid flaky failures from runner contention (Linux ~2s, Windows ~4s typical) | ||
| has_runner_contention = bool(os.getenv("CI") or os.getenv("GITHUB_ACTIONS") or os.getenv("PYTEST_XDIST_WORKER")) | ||
| has_runner_contention = bool( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This edit makes test_large_file_scanning_performance a modified pytest test, but the test still lacks tmp_path: Path and -> None; the repo test-style rule says to apply typing to all new or modified tests and explicitly calls out tmp_path: Path (AGENTS.md lines 120-121). Please update the function signature while touching this test so it stays consistent with the documented test requirements.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
mldangelo-oai
left a comment
mldangelo-oai
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Validated release PR for modelaudit 0.2.46 / modelaudit-picklescan 0.1.6. Checked release metadata and dependency constraints, rebuilt both packages, twine-checked artifacts, smoke-installed wheels, stabilized release validation tests, and watched CI to green.
|
🤖 Created releases: 🌻 |
1 participant
🤖 I have created a release beep boop
0.2.46
0.2.46 (2026-06-05)
Bug Fixes
Performance Improvements
Documentation
modelaudit-picklescan: 0.1.6
0.1.6 (2026-06-05)
Bug Fixes
Performance Improvements
Documentation
This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.