Skip to content

docs: make CLAUDE.md a compatibility shim#36

Closed
jbeckwith-oai wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
codex/agent-docs
Closed

docs: make CLAUDE.md a compatibility shim#36
jbeckwith-oai wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
codex/agent-docs

Conversation

@jbeckwith-oai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • replace bare CLAUDE.md pointer with an explicit compatibility shim to AGENTS.md

Test Plan

  • not run (docs-only change)

Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mldangelo-oai mldangelo-oai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@AGENTS.md should be sufficient here

Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

if [[ "$LINT_RESULT" == "failure" || "$LINT_RESULT" == "cancelled" ||
"$TYPE_CHECK_RESULT" == "failure" || "$TYPE_CHECK_RESULT" == "cancelled" ||
"$TEST_RESULT" == "failure" || "$TEST_RESULT" == "cancelled" ||
"$TEST_NPX_FALLBACK_RESULT" == "failure" || "$TEST_NPX_FALLBACK_RESULT" == "cancelled" ||
"$BUILD_RESULT" == "failure" || "$BUILD_RESULT" == "cancelled" ]]; then

P1 Badge Fail CI when classify-changes job fails

ci-success now depends on classify-changes, but its gate only checks lint/type/test/build results. If classify-changes errors (e.g., bad SHA diff), downstream jobs are skipped and this step still exits 0, producing a false green required check. Include needs.classify-changes.result in the failure condition.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants