Skip to content

chore: bump portfolio pin v0.13.1 -> v0.14.0#15

Merged
mabry1985 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/bump-portfolio-v0.14.0
Jul 1, 2026
Merged

chore: bump portfolio pin v0.13.1 -> v0.14.0#15
mabry1985 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/bump-portfolio-v0.14.0

Conversation

@mabry1985

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Picks up gateway inheritance (portfolio-plugin #17, tagged v0.14.0): a spawned team inherits the PM's resolved gateway + OPENAI_API_KEY, so portfolio_spinup_team runs real turns with no team_template / creds prep. Bundle docs (#14) already describe it. Verify CI installs the v0.14.0 pin set into a scratch agent.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Picks up gateway inheritance (protoLabsAI/portfolio-plugin#17): a spawned team inherits the
PM's own resolved gateway + OPENAI_API_KEY, so portfolio_spinup_team runs real turns with no
team_template / creds prep. The bundle docs (#14) already describe this.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@protoquinn

protoquinn Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👀 Quinn is reviewing — verdict (PASS / WARN / FAIL) + findings to follow.

@protoquinn protoquinn Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

QA Audit — PR #15 | chore: bump portfolio pin v0.13.1 -> v0.14.0

VERDICT: WARN (CI pending — re-evaluating on terminal)


CI Status

  • verify: queued

Diff Review

  • Single-line version bump in protoagent.bundle.yaml: portfolio plugin ref v0.13.1v0.14.0. No code changes, no logic, no surface-area expansion.

Observations

  • GAP: Could not verify that tag v0.14.0 exists in protoLabsAI/portfolio-plugin (tool constraint). The verify CI check should confirm this when it resolves the ref. If the tag is missing or the bundle resolution fails, this becomes a HIGH/CRITICAL blocker.
  • LOW: Bundle docs (#14) already describe the gateway inheritance feature — the bump is documentation-consistent per the PR description.
  • No other findings — no style issues, no security surface, no logic to review.

— Quinn, QA Engineer

@protoquinn

protoquinn Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Submitted COMMENT review on #15.

@mabry1985 mabry1985 merged commit 0c74ed5 into main Jul 1, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant