Skip to content

[Documentation] Update comparison#1009

Merged
jan-janssen merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
compare
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

[Documentation] Update comparison#1009
jan-janssen merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
compare

Conversation

@jan-janssen

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated comparison table column header from "Concurrent futures" to "Futures" for improved clarity across documentation.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR updates documentation to standardize naming conventions across comparison tables. The column header for the standard-library baseline executor is renamed from "Concurrent futures" to "Futures" in the README and the detailed comparison documentation, with a corresponding section heading update.

Changes

Documentation Terminology Update

Layer / File(s) Summary
Rename "Concurrent futures" to "Futures" in comparison documentation
README.md, docs/comparison.md
The "At a glance" comparison table header and matching section heading are updated to consistently use "Futures" instead of "Concurrent futures" for the standard-library baseline executor column.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

A bunny hops through docs with care,
Renaming labels, neat and fair—
"Futures" shines where once it sprawled,
Consistency achieved, all called! 🐰✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title '[Documentation] Update comparison' is vague and generic, using non-descriptive terms that don't convey specific information about what was changed in the comparison documentation. Consider a more specific title that describes the actual change, such as '[Documentation] Rename comparison table column from Concurrent futures to Futures'.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch compare

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
README.md (1)

155-155: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win

Update documentation index to match the renamed section.

The link text still says "Concurrent futures" and points to the old anchor #concurrent-futures-the-python-standard-library. Since the section heading in docs/comparison.md was renamed to "Futures" (line 25), this link should be updated for consistency.

📝 Proposed fix
-  * [Concurrent futures](https://executorlib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/comparison.html#concurrent-futures-the-python-standard-library)
+  * [Futures](https://executorlib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/comparison.html#futures)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@README.md` at line 155, Update the README link that currently reads
"Concurrent futures" and points to the old anchor
`#concurrent-futures-the-python-standard-library` so it matches the renamed
section heading in docs/comparison.md ("Futures"); change the link text to
"Futures" and update the anchor to `#futures` so the reference resolves
correctly.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Outside diff comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 155: Update the README link that currently reads "Concurrent futures" and
points to the old anchor `#concurrent-futures-the-python-standard-library` so it
matches the renamed section heading in docs/comparison.md ("Futures"); change
the link text to "Futures" and update the anchor to `#futures` so the reference
resolves correctly.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 788a7444-ffa8-4355-9ee3-ae779f0da017

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 19a0cce and db9148e.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md
  • docs/comparison.md

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.19%. Comparing base (19a0cce) to head (db9148e).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1009   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.19%   94.19%           
=======================================
  Files          39       39           
  Lines        2103     2103           
=======================================
  Hits         1981     1981           
  Misses        122      122           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jan-janssen
jan-janssen merged commit 74dda24 into main Jun 10, 2026
63 of 65 checks passed
@jan-janssen
jan-janssen deleted the compare branch June 10, 2026 12:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant