[Documentation] Update comparison#1009
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR updates documentation to standardize naming conventions across comparison tables. The column header for the standard-library baseline executor is renamed from "Concurrent futures" to "Futures" in the README and the detailed comparison documentation, with a corresponding section heading update. ChangesDocumentation Terminology Update
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
README.md (1)
155-155:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winUpdate documentation index to match the renamed section.
The link text still says "Concurrent futures" and points to the old anchor
#concurrent-futures-the-python-standard-library. Since the section heading indocs/comparison.mdwas renamed to "Futures" (line 25), this link should be updated for consistency.📝 Proposed fix
- * [Concurrent futures](https://executorlib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/comparison.html#concurrent-futures-the-python-standard-library) + * [Futures](https://executorlib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/comparison.html#futures)🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@README.md` at line 155, Update the README link that currently reads "Concurrent futures" and points to the old anchor `#concurrent-futures-the-python-standard-library` so it matches the renamed section heading in docs/comparison.md ("Futures"); change the link text to "Futures" and update the anchor to `#futures` so the reference resolves correctly.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Outside diff comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 155: Update the README link that currently reads "Concurrent futures" and
points to the old anchor `#concurrent-futures-the-python-standard-library` so it
matches the renamed section heading in docs/comparison.md ("Futures"); change
the link text to "Futures" and update the anchor to `#futures` so the reference
resolves correctly.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 788a7444-ffa8-4355-9ee3-ae779f0da017
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
README.mddocs/comparison.md
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1009 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 94.19% 94.19%
=======================================
Files 39 39
Lines 2103 2103
=======================================
Hits 1981 1981
Misses 122 122 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Summary by CodeRabbit