For the paper we need a table which shows our obtained results in comparison to the previously published results.
I suggest the following format, here a excerpt from the FB15k table
|
|
MR |
MRR (%) |
AMR (%) |
Hits@1 (%) |
Hits@3 (%) |
Hits@5 (%) |
Hits@10 (%) |
| ComplEx |
[Troullion2016]o |
- |
69.2 |
- |
59.9 |
75.9 |
- |
84.0 |
|
best |
171.16 ± 16.05 |
19.13 ± 0.45 |
2.46 ± 0.28 |
10.06 ± 0.42 |
20.82 ± 0.67 |
27.59 ± 0.94 |
38.03 ± 1.02 |
|
... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ConvE |
[Dettmers2018]n |
51 |
65.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
best |
50.76 ± 0.40 |
59.56 ± 0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
with the following legend:
- With b / a / w / n we denote that the best / average / worst / non-deterministic rank
- [Troullion2016] should be a proper reference
For the paper we need a table which shows our obtained results in comparison to the previously published results.
I suggest the following format, here a excerpt from the FB15k table
with the following legend: